The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase III Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Sialyl-TN (STn)-Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Vaccine for Metastatic Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose.: This double-blind, randomized, phase III clinical trial evaluated time to progression (TTP) and overall survival in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who received sialyl-TN (STn) keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) vaccine. Secondary endpoints included vaccine safety and immune response. Experimental design.: The study population consisted of 1,028 women with MBC across 126 centers who had previously received chemotherapy and had had either a complete or a partial response or no disease progression. All women received one-time i.v. cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) 3 days before s.c. injection of 100 μg STn-KLH plus adjuvant (treatment group) or 100 μg KLH plus adjuvant (control group) at weeks 0, 2, 5, and 9. Subsequently, STn-KLH without adjuvant or KLH without adjuvant was then administered monthly for 4 months, and then quarterly until disease progression, without cyclophosphamide. Results.: STn-KLH vaccine was well tolerated; patients had mild to moderate injection-site reactions and reversible flu-like symptoms. Week-12 antibody testing revealed high specific IgG titers and a high rate of IgM-to-IgG seroconversion; the median IgG titers in STn-KLH recipients were 320 (anti-ovine submaxillary mucin) and 20,480 (anti-STn), with no detectable antimucin antibodies in the control group. The TTP was 3.4 months in the treatment group and 3.0 months in the control group. The median survival times were 23.1 months and 22.3 months, respectively. Conclusions.: Although STn-KLH was well tolerated in this largest to date metastatic breast cancer vaccine trial, no overall benefit in TTP or survival was observed. Lessons were learned for future vaccine study designs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1968) · American Association of Industrial Nurses Journal · doi:10.1177/216507996801601208 · Cited by 8,798
Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006
Ferlay, J., Autier, P., Boniol, M., Heanue, M., Colombet, M., & Boyle, P. (2007) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl498 · Cited by 4,036
A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials
O'Brien, P. C., & Fleming, T. R. (1979) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530245 · Cited by 3,311
Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., & Bottomley, A. (2001) · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · Cited by 2,521
Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials
GORDON LAN, K. K., & DEMETS, D. L. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.3.659 · Cited by 2,310
Parkin, D. M. (2004) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207726 · Cited by 574
Expression of Tn, sialosyl-Tn, and T antigens in human colon cancer.
Itzkowitz, S., Yuan, M., Montgomery, C. K., Kjeldsen, T., Takahashi, H., Bigbee, W. L., & Kim, Y. S. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 511
Breast carcinoma survival in Europe and the United States: A population‐based study
Sant, M., Allemani, C., Berrino, F., Coleman, M. P., Aareleid, T., Chaplain, G., Coebergh, J. W., Colonna, M., Crosignani, P., Danzon, A., et al. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20038 · Cited by 208
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Wei, X., Xu, H., & Kufe, D. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.030 · Cited by 186
MacLean, G. D., Reddish, M. A., Koganty, R. R., Wong, T. C., Gandhi, S. S., Smolenski, M., Samuel, J., Nabholtz, J. M., & Longenecker, B. M. (1993) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/bf01740902 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Protein Glycosylation in Cancer
Stowell, S. R., Ju, T., & Cummings, R. D. (2015) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040438 · Cited by 873
The Interplay of Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy: Harnessing Potential Synergies
Emens, L. A., & Middleton, G. (2015) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-15-0064 · Cited by 831
Advancements in clinical aspects of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in breast cancer
Ye, F., Dewanjee, S., Li, Y., Jha, N. K., Chen, Z.-S., Kumar, A., Vishakha, Behl, T., Jha, S. K., & Tang, H. (2023) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01805-y · Cited by 554
The tumour glyco-code as a novel immune checkpoint for immunotherapy
RodrÍguez, E., Schetters, S. T. T., & van Kooyk, Y. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2018.3 · Cited by 473
Emerging principles for the therapeutic exploitation of glycosylation
Dalziel, M., Crispin, M., Scanlan, C. N., Zitzmann, N., & Dwek, R. A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235681 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, D., Roché, H., Martin, M., Perren, T. J., Cameron, D. A., Glaspy, J., Dodwell, D., Parker, J., Mayordomo, J., Tres, A., Murray, J. L., Ibrahim, N. K., & the Theratope® Study Group
- Venue
- The Oncologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-14
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1092-1100
- ISSN
- 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2102718441
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Sialyl-TN (STn)-Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Vaccine for Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0307
- The paper
- Miles, D., Roché, H., Martin, M., Perren, T. J., Cameron, D. A., Glaspy, J., Dodwell, D., Parker, J., Mayordomo, J., Tres, A., Murray, J. L., Ibrahim, N. K., & the Theratope® Study Group. (2011). Phase III Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Sialyl-TN (STn)-Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Vaccine for Metastatic Breast Cancer. The Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.