Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase I trial of intraperitoneal taxol: a Gynecoloic Oncology Group study.

Markman, M, Rowinsky, E, Hakes, T, Reichman, B, Jones, W, Lewis, J L, Rubin, S, Curtin, J, Barakat, R, Phillips, M·1992·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and pharmacology of the intraperitoneal (IP) administration of the antineoplastic agent taxol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five pretreated patients who were entered onto a phase I clinical trial; 24 had advanced ovarian cancer. Patients were treated with taxol administered IP in 2 L of normal saline every 3 to 4 weeks. The starting dose was 25 mg/m2. There were no intrapatient dose escalations. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity was the development of severe abdominal pain at taxol doses more than 175 mg/m2. Moderate leukopenia (WBC count less than 2,000/mm3) was observed at IP doses of greater than or equal to 175 mg/m2. The exposure of the peritoneal cavity (peak levels and area under the time-versus-concentration curve [AUC]) to taxol after IP delivery exceeded that of the plasma by approximately 1,000-fold. However, concentrations of the agent previously shown to produce cytotoxicity in experimental systems were demonstrated in the systemic compartment after regional delivery, which was considered important. Significant concentrations of taxol persisted within the peritoneal cavity for more than 24 to 48 hours after a single IP installation. Several antitumor responses, which included control of platinum-refractory ascites, were documented. CONCLUSION: Taxol can be delivered by the IP route with both an acceptable toxicity profile and a major pharmacokinetic advantage for cavity exposure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1992.10.9.1485

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Markman, M., Rowinsky, E., Hakes, T., Reichman, B., Jones, W., Lewis, J. L., Rubin, S., Curtin, J., Barakat, R., & Phillips, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1992-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1485-1491
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2142114138
Cited by
313
References
8
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I trial of intraperitoneal taxol: a Gynecoloic Oncology Group study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1992.10.9.1485
The paper
Markman, M., Rowinsky, E., Hakes, T., Reichman, B., Jones, W., Lewis, J. L., Rubin, S., Curtin, J., Barakat, R., & Phillips, M. (1992). Phase I trial of intraperitoneal taxol: a Gynecoloic Oncology Group study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1992.10.9.1485

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.