The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study of oral pilocarpine for treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of pilocarpine hydrochloride for symptomatic relief of postradiation xerostomia symptoms and for saliva production in patients with head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-two head and neck cancer patients who had received at least 40 Gy of radiation (117 patients had received > 60 Gy) with clinically significant xerostomia were enrolled onto a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical investigation. Patients received 2.5-mg tablets for the first 4 weeks, 5.0-mg tablets for the second 4 weeks, and 10.0-mg tablets for the last 4 weeks of the 12-week study. Patients were allowed to titrate pilocarpine or placebo for improvement in symptoms or to reduce side effects. Patients were evaluated for symptomatic relief by questionnaires and visual analog scales (VAS), and for saliva production by sialometry. RESULTS: Pilocarpine produced a significant improvement (P = .035) in overall global assessments compared with placebo. There was a statistically significant (P = .020) decreased use of oral comfort agents such as artificial saliva, hard candy, and water. Values for symptomatic improvement in dryness approached significance (P = .057). There were statistically significant postdose improvements in whole and parotid salivary flow in pilocarpine treatment groups versus placebo. All pilocarpine dosages tested were judged to be safe. Adverse experiences were primarily sweating, rhinitis, headache, nausea, and urinary frequency, with the most common side effect being mild to moderate sweating. There were no serious drug-related adverse experiences in any of the pilocarpine treatment groups. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that pilocarpine produces clinically significant benefits for the symptomatic treatment of postradiation xerostomia. Best results were obtained with continuous treatment for 8 to 12 weeks with doses greater than 2.5 mg three times per day.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xerostomia: evaluation of a symptom with increasing significance
Fox, P. C., van der Ven, P. F., Sonies, B. C., Weiffenbach, J. M., & Baum, B. J. (1985) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0384 · Cited by 524
Role of salivary mucins in the protection of the oral cavity
Tabak, L. A., Levine, M. J., Mandel, I. D., & Ellison, S. A. (1982) · Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00138.x · Cited by 519
Pilocarpine Treatment of Salivary Gland Hypofunction and Dry Mouth (Xerostomia)
Fox, P. C. (1991) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.151.6.1149 · Cited by 200
Milne, R. W., & Dawes, C. (1973) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.1973.tb04377.x · Cited by 103
Therapy‐induced dysfunction of salivary glands: implications for oral health
Baum, B. J., Bodner, L., Fox, P. C., Izutsu, K. T., Pizzo, P. A., & Wright, W. E. (1985) · Special Care in Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1754-4505.1985.tb00593.x · Cited by 86
Unique radiosensitivity of serous cells in rhesus monkey submandibular glands.
Stephens, L. C., King, G. K., Peters, L. J., et al. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 67
Cited by
Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer
Eisbruch, A., Kim, H. M., Terrell, J. E., Marsh, L. H., Dawson, L. A., & Ship, J. A. (2001) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01512-7 · Cited by 770
P revention and T reatment of the C onsequences of H ead and N eck R adiotherapy
Vissink, A., Burlage, F. R., Spijkervet, F. K. L., Jansma, J., & Coppes, R. P. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/154411130301400306 · Cited by 384
Oral pilocarpine for treatment of opioid-induced oral dryness in healthy adults
Götrick, B., Åkerman, S., Ericson, D., Torstenson, R., & Tobin, G. (2004) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910408300508 · Cited by 41
Muniz, M., Loprinzi, C. L., Orme, J. J., Koch, R. M., Mahmoud, A. M., Kase, A. M., Riaz, I. B., Andrews, J. R., Thorpe, M. P., Johnson, G. B., et al. (2024) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102748 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- LeVeque, F. G., Montgomery, M., Potter, D., Zimmer, M. B., Rieke, J. W., Steiger, B. W., Gallagher, S. C., & Muscoplat, C. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1124-1131
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1846716296
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study of oral pilocarpine for treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1993.11.6.1124
- The paper
- LeVeque, F. G., Montgomery, M., Potter, D., Zimmer, M. B., Rieke, J. W., Steiger, B. W., Gallagher, S. C., & Muscoplat, C. C. (1993). A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study of oral pilocarpine for treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1993.11.6.1124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.