The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neurobehavioral sequelae of cranial irradiation in adults: a review of radiation-induced encephalopathy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine behavioral dimensions of treatment outcomes for patients receiving cranial irradiation. Radiation encephalopathy is one of these and refers to significant cognitive and emotional dysfunction following radiation therapy to the brain. Issues of definition, estimated incidence, pathophysiologic mechanisms, and recommended research designs are reviewed in relationship to functional neurobehavioral outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine studies of adults receiving therapeutic cranial irradiation (TCI) involving 748 patients and 18 studies of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) involving 368 patients are reviewed. Assessment of patient outcomes are summarized for research published since 1980, with specific attention to adverse changes in cognitive and emotional functioning. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that 213 TCI patients and 100 PCI patients showed encephalopathy attributed to radiation. Manifestations of the late delayed effects of radiotherapy on brain function are related to patient age, total dose of irradiation, fraction sizes, and timing of chemotherapy. Radiation encephalopathy appears to be more common than the pathologic tissue injury of radiation necrosis. Accurate diagnosis of these neurobehavioral sequelae can require follow-up over a period of years with sensitive assessment procedures. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the true incidence of treatment-related side effects of cranial irradiation in adults who survive more than 6 months without brain tumor growth or recurrence has been significantly underestimated. Research designs that include formal neuropsychologic assessment in conjunction with other neurodiagnostic tests can provide more comprehensive evaluation of long-term neurobehavioral outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stewart, F. A., Akleyev, A. V., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hendry, J. H., Kleiman, N. J., MacVittie, T. J., Aleman, B. M., Edgar, A. B., Mabuchi, K., Muirhead, C. R., et al. (2012) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 · Cited by 1,604
Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell dysfunction
Monje, M. L., Mizumatsu, S., Fike, J. R., & Palmer, T. D. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm749 · Cited by 1,271
Whole-Brain Radiotherapy in the Management of Brain Metastasis
Khuntia, D., Brown, P., Li, J., & Mehta, M. P. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.6185 · Cited by 466
Neurological complications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy
Keime-Guibert, F., Napolitano, M., & Delattre, J.-Y. (1998) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s004150050271 · Cited by 246
The Attentional Function Index—a self-report cognitive measure
Cimprich, B., Visovatti, M., & Ronis, D. L. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1729 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Crossen, J. R., Garwood, D., Glatstein, E., & Neuwelt, E. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 627-642
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2158628168
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurobehavioral sequelae of cranial irradiation in adults: a review of radiation-induced encephalopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.3.627
- The paper
- Crossen, J. R., Garwood, D., Glatstein, E., & Neuwelt, E. A. (1994). Neurobehavioral sequelae of cranial irradiation in adults: a review of radiation-induced encephalopathy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.3.627
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.