Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Randomized phase III trial in childhood high-grade astrocytoma comparing vincristine, lomustine, and prednisone with the eight-drugs-in-1-day regimen. Childrens Cancer Group.

Finlay, J L, Boyett, J M, Yates, A J, Wisoff, J H, Milstein, J M, Geyer, J R, Bertolone, S J, McGuire, P, Cherlow, J M, Tefft, M·1995·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a previous randomized trial, the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to postoperative radiotherapy proved beneficial in the treatment of childhood high-grade astrocytomas. The present study tests the hypothesis that an eight-drug adjuvant chemotherapy regimen would improve survival in such children compared with the three-drug regimen of the prior study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1985 and May 1990, patients between the ages of 18 months and 21 years with newly diagnosed high-grade astrocytomas were eligible for this study, as determined by the treating institution's histopathologic diagnosis. Treatment consisted of postoperative local-field radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, either lomustine (CCNU), vincristine, and prednisone (control regimen) or eight-drugs-in-1-day chemotherapy (experimental regimen). Two cycles of postoperative preirradiation chemotherapy were administered in the experimental regimen. Patients were evaluated radiographically every 3 months after irradiation. RESULTS: Eighty-five eligible patients were randomized to the control regimen and 87 to the experimental regimen. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 33% (SE = 5%) and 36% (SE = 6%), respectively. There was no statistical difference in outcome between the two chemotherapy regimens. In patients with confirmed diagnoses of anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), anaplastic astrocytoma, greater than 90% resection, and nonmidline tumor location were characteristics predictive of an improved PFS. There was a difference in toxicity between the two chemotherapeutic regimens, with greater myelosuppression and hearing loss in the experimental regimen. Tumor recurrence occurred primarily within the primary tumor site. CONCLUSIONS: There is no benefit to the treatment of high-grade astrocytomas in children with eight-drugs-in-1-day chemotherapy compared with CCNU, vincristine, and prednisone. Extent of tumor resection and histopathologic diagnosis are significant prognostic variables. The overall outcome for children with high-grade astrocytomas remains poor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1995.13.1.112

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Finlay, J. L., Boyett, J. M., Yates, A. J., Wisoff, J. H., Milstein, J. M., Geyer, J. R., Bertolone, S. J., McGuire, P., Cherlow, J. M., & Tefft, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1995-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
112-123
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1884303117
Cited by
366
References
0
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized phase III trial in childhood high-grade astrocytoma comparing vincristine, lomustine, and prednisone with the eight-drugs-in-1-day regimen. Childrens Cancer Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1995.13.1.112
The paper
Finlay, J. L., Boyett, J. M., Yates, A. J., Wisoff, J. H., Milstein, J. M., Geyer, J. R., Bertolone, S. J., McGuire, P., Cherlow, J. M., & Tefft, M. (1995). Randomized phase III trial in childhood high-grade astrocytoma comparing vincristine, lomustine, and prednisone with the eight-drugs-in-1-day regimen. Childrens Cancer Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1995.13.1.112

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.