The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimen in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five assessable patients were entered onto seven phase II clinical trials. Proleukin (aldesleukin; Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA) 600,000 or 720,000 IU/kg was administered by 15-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 8 hours for up to 14 consecutive doses over 5 days as clinically tolerated with maximum support, including pressors. A second identical cycle of treatment was scheduled following 5 to 9 days of rest, and courses could be repeated every 6 to 12 weeks in stable or responding patients. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate was 14% (90% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 19%), with 12 (5%) complete responses (CRs) and 24 (9%) partial responses (PRs). Responses occurred in all sites of disease, including bone, intact primary tumors, and visceral metastases, and in patients with large tumor burdens or bulky individual lesions. The median response duration for patients who achieved a CR has not been reached, but was 19.0 months for those who achieved a PR. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was the only predictive prognostic factor for response to IL-2. While treatment was associated with severe acute toxicities, these generally reversed rapidly after therapy was completed. However, 4% of patients died of adverse events judged to be possibly or probably treatment-related. CONCLUSION: High-dose IL-2 appears to benefit some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma by producing durable CRs or PRs. Despite severe acute treatment-associated toxicities, IL-2 should be considered for initial therapy of patients with appropriately selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McDermott, D. F., Regan, M. M., Clark, J. I., Flaherty, L. E., Weiss, G. R., Logan, T. F., Kirkwood, J. M., Gordon, M. S., Sosman, J. A., Ernstoff, M. S., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.206 · Cited by 820
Cytokines in the Treatment of Cancer
Conlon, K. C., Miljkovic, M. D., & Waldmann, T. A. (2019) · Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research · doi:10.1089/jir.2018.0019 · Cited by 518
Cytokines in Cancer Immunotherapy
Waldmann, T. A. (2018) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a028472 · Cited by 507
Interleukin 12: still a promising candidate for tumor immunotherapy?
Lasek, W., Zagożdżon, R., & Jakobisiak, M. (2014) · Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/s00262-014-1523-1 · Cited by 495
Kokolus, K. M., Capitano, M. L., Lee, C.-T., Eng, J. W.-L., Waight, J. D., Hylander, B. L., Sexton, S., Hong, C.-C., Gordon, C. J., Abrams, S. I., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1304291110 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Fyfe, G., Fisher, R. I., Rosenberg, S. A., Sznol, M., Parkinson, D. R., & Louie, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 688-696
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2123914905
- Cited by
- 1,391
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1995.13.3.688
- The paper
- Fyfe, G., Fisher, R. I., Rosenberg, S. A., Sznol, M., Parkinson, D. R., & Louie, A. C. (1995). Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1995.13.3.688
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.