Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase II study of fluorouracil and its modulation in advanced colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Leichman, C G, Fleming, T R, Muggia, F M, Tangen, C M, Ardalan, B, Doroshow, J H, Meyers, F J, Holcombe, R F, Weiss, G R, Mangalik, A·1995·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: A variety of fluorinated pyrimidine-based regimens for the treatment of disseminated colorectal cancer have been presented in the medical literature. The Southwest Oncology Group designed a screening trial of seven regimens of fluorouracil (5-FU) to assess efficacy and toxicity afforded by biochemical modulation or schedule variations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred twenty patients were entered into this trial between August 1989 and January 1993. Eligible patients were classified as having recurrent or disseminated disease that was measurable or nonmeasurable. All eligible patients were evaluated for toxicity and survival; patients with measurable disease were evaluated for response according to standard criteria. RESULTS: No regimen achieved a higher response rate than single-agent bolus 5-FU. Eighty-four percent of patients have been monitored until death. The median survival time for the entire cohort is 14 months. Survival hazards ratios showed a positive trend in favor of the unmodulated infusion regimens, while high-grade toxicities occurred more frequently in the 5-FU bolus arms. The major high-grade toxicities were granulocytopenia and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: In this trial, no regimen provided substantial improvement relative to 5-FU bolus or single-agent therapy for either response or survival in the treatment of disseminated colorectal cancer. The single-agent infusion regimens demonstrated the most encouraging results with a favorable toxicity profile and a 2-month longer survival duration than 5-FU bolus therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1995.13.6.1303

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Leichman, C. G., Fleming, T. R., Muggia, F. M., Tangen, C. M., Ardalan, B., Doroshow, J. H., Meyers, F. J., Holcombe, R. F., Weiss, G. R., & Mangalik, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1995-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
1303-1311
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2227311140
Cited by
359
References
10
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II study of fluorouracil and its modulation in advanced colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1995.13.6.1303
The paper
Leichman, C. G., Fleming, T. R., Muggia, F. M., Tangen, C. M., Ardalan, B., Doroshow, J. H., Meyers, F. J., Holcombe, R. F., Weiss, G. R., & Mangalik, A. (1995). Phase II study of fluorouracil and its modulation in advanced colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1995.13.6.1303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.