The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: This trial was performed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant brachytherapy on local and systemic recurrence rates in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a single-institution prospective randomized trial, 164 patients were randomized intraoperatively to receive either adjuvant brachytherapy (BRT) or no further therapy (no BRT) after complete resection of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity or superficial trunk. The adjuvant radiation was administered by iridium-192 implant, which delivered 42 to 45 Gy over 4 to 6 days. The two study groups had comparable distributions of patient and tumor factors, including age, sex, tumor site, tumor size, and histologic type and grade. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 76 months, the 5-year actuarial local control rates were 82% and 69% in the BRT and no BRT groups (P = .04), respectively. Patients with high-grade lesions had local control rates of 89% (BRT) and 66% (no BRT) (P = .0025). BRT had no impact on local control in patients with low-grade lesions (P = .49). The 5-year freedom-from-distant-recurrence rates were 83% and 76% in the BRT and no BRT groups (P = .60), respectively. Analysis by histologic grade did not demonstrate an impact of BRT on the development of distant metastasis, despite the improvement in local control noted in patients with high-grade lesions. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for the BRT and no BRT groups were 84% and 81% (P = .65), respectively, with no impact of BRT regardless of tumor grade. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant brachytherapy improves local control after complete resection of soft tissue sarcomas. This improvement in local control is limited to patients with high-grade histopathology. The reduction in local recurrence in patients with high-grade lesions is not associated with a significant reduction in distant metastasis or improvement in disease-specific survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yang, J. C., Chang, A. E., Baker, A. R., Sindelar, W. F., Danforth, D. N., Topalian, S. L., DeLaney, T., Glatstein, E., Steinberg, S. M., Merino, M. J., et al. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.1.197 · Cited by 1,541
Gronchi, A., Miah, A. B., Dei Tos, A. P., Abecassis, N., Bajpai, J., Bauer, S., Biagini, R., Bielack, S., Blay, J. Y., Bolle, S., et al. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.006 · Cited by 1,115
Cormier, J. N., & Pollock, R. E. (2004) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.54.2.94 · Cited by 835
DAVIS, A., OSULLIVAN, B., TURCOTTE, R., BELL, R., CATTON, C., CHABOT, P., WUNDER, J., HAMMOND, A., BENK, V, & KANDEL, R. (2005) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.020 · Cited by 710
Issels, R. D., Lindner, L. H., Verweij, J., Wust, P., Reichardt, P., Schem, B.-C., Abdel-Rahman, S., Daugaard, S., Salat, C., Wendtner, C.-M., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70071-1 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Authors
- Pisters, P. W., Harrison, L. B., Leung, D. H., Woodruff, J. M., Casper, E. S., & Brennan, M. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 859-868
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1878715328
- Cited by
- 1,001
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1996.14.3.859
- The paper
- Pisters, P. W., Harrison, L. B., Leung, D. H., Woodruff, J. M., Casper, E. S., & Brennan, M. F. (1996). Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1996.14.3.859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.