The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anastrozole, a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor, versus megestrol acetate in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of overview analysis of two phase III trials. Arimidex Study Group.
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (1 and 10 mg once daily), a selective, oral, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor, and megestrol acetate (40 mg four times daily), in postmenopausal women who progressed following tamoxifen treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind for anastrozole, open-label for megestrol acetate, parallel-group, multicenter trials were conducted in 764 patients. Because both trials were identical in design, an analysis of the combined results was performed to strengthen interpretation of results from each trial. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was approximately 6 months. The estimated progression hazards ratios were 0.97 (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.24) for anastrozole 1 mg versus megestrol acetate and 0.92 (97.5% CI, 0.71 to 1.19) for anastrozole 10 mg versus megestrol acetate. The overall median time to progression was approximately 21 weeks. Approximately one third of patients in each group benefited from treatment. Twenty-seven patients (10.3%) in the anastrozole 1-mg group, 22 (8.9%) in the anastrozole 10-mg group, and 20 (7.9%) in the megestrol acetate group had a complete or partial response, and 66 (25.1%), 56 (22.6%), and 66 (26.1%) patients, respectively, had stable disease for > or = 24 weeks. For all end points, individual trial results were similar to the results of the combined analysis. Anastrozole and megestrol acetate were well tolerated. Gastrointestinal disturbance was more common among patients in the anastrozole groups than the megestrol acetate group; the difference between the anastrozole 10 mg and megestrol acetate groups was significant (P = .005). Significantly fewer patients in the anastrozole 1-mg (P < .0001) and 10-mg (P < .002) groups had weight gain than in the megestrol acetate group. More than 30% of megestrol acetate-treated patients had weight gain > or = 5%, and 10% of patients had weight gain > or = 10%. Patients who received megestrol acetate continued to gain weight over time. CONCLUSION: Anastrozole, 1 and 10 mg once daily, is well tolerated and as effective as megestrol acetate in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who progressed following tamoxifen treatment. Moreover, anastrozole therapy avoids the weight gain associated with megestrol acetate treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
de Haes, J., van Knippenberg, F. C. E., & Neijt, J. P. (1990) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1990.434 · Cited by 907
Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer
Hayward, J. L., Carbone, P. P., Heusen, J. C., KUMAOKA, S., SEGALOFF, A., & Rubens, R. D. (1977) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1977.42 · Cited by 715
Tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer
Mouridsen, H. T., Palshof, T., Patterson, J., & Battersby, L. (1978) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0305-7372(78)80017-6 · Cited by 333
Controlled Trial of Megestrol Acetate for the Treatment of Cancer Anorexia and Cachexia
Loprinzi, C. L., Ellison, N. M., Schaid, D. J., Krook, J. E., Athmann, L. M., Dose, A. M., Mailliard, J. A., Johnson, P. S., Ebbert, L. P., & Geeraerts, L. (1990) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/82.13.1127 · Cited by 318
Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer
Hayward, J. L., Carbone, P. P., Heuson, J.-C., KUMAOKA, S., SEGALOFF, A., & Rubens, R. D. (1977) · European Journal of Cancer (1965) · doi:10.1016/0014-2964(77)90234-1 · Cited by 310
Arimidex�: A potent and selective fourth-generation aromatase inhibitor
Plourde, P. V., Dyroff, M. C., & Dukes, M. (1994) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/bf00682745 · Cited by 258
Experimental and clinical results with intraperitoneal cisplatin.
Huinink, W. W. T. B., Dubbelman, R., Aartsen, E. J., Franklin, H. L., & Jg, M. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 148
Howell, A., Mackintosh, J., Jones, M., Redford, J., Wagstaff, J., & Sellwood, R. A. (1988) · European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/0277-5379(88)90046-6 · Cited by 106
Ingle, J. N., Ahmann, D. L., Green, S., Edmonson, J. H., Creagan, E. T., Hahn, R. G., & Rubin, J. (1982) · American Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1097/00000421-198204000-00062 · Cited by 73
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–406 of 406
Tadisetty, N. R., Yanamandra, R., Pradhan, S., & Pradhan, G. (2025) · Biomedical Chromatography · doi:10.1002/bmc.70279
Cancer du sein chez les femmes âgées
Espié, M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-2-287-48618-0_8
Kern, F. G. (1999) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-699-7_12
Recent Developments in the Hormonal Treatment of Breast Cancer
Boeddinghaus, I., & Dowsett, M. (2002) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.3109/9780203909249-15
Aromatase Inhibitors as Chemopreventives of Breast Cancer
Dowsett, M., & Garber, J. E. (2004) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-767-3_15
Metadata
- Authors
- Buzdar, A., Jonat, W., Howell, A., Jones, S. E., Blomqvist, C., Vogel, C. L., Eiermann, W., Wolter, J. M., Azab, M., Webster, A., & Plourde, P. V.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2000-2011
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1909697168
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- anastrozole, megestrol acetate, aromatase inhibitors, advanced breast cancer, postmenopausal women, progression-free survival, time to progression, complete response, stable disease, gastrointestinal adverse effects, weight gain, drug tolerability, dose comparison, combination chemotherapy, combined radiotherapy, combination endocrine therapy
- MeSH terms
- Anastrozole, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Megestrol, Middle Aged, Nitriles, Prognosis, Tamoxifen, Triazoles, Survival Rate, Postmenopause, Disease Progression, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Megestrol Acetate, Aromatase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review