The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in patients with AIDS and Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS-KS) who experienced failure of standard chemotherapy. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with advanced AIDS-KS who experienced disease progression or intolerable toxicities while receiving standard doxorubicin/bleomycin/vincristine (ABV) or bleomycin/vincristine (BV) chemotherapy were identified from a cohort of patients who were then treated with pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin. Patients received 20 mg/m2 pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil; Sequus Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Menlo Park, CA) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (36%) had a partial response (PR) and one patient had a clinical complete response (CCR). The median duration of response and time (from study entry) to treatment failure were 128 and 134 days, respectively. Of 28 patients who experienced disease progression while receiving combination regimens that contained standard doxorubicin, the PR rate was 32%, which suggests that the pegylated-liposomal encapsulation increases the therapeutic effect of doxorubicin. Patients obtained clinical benefits such as flattening of lesions (48%), improved lesion color (56%), relief of pain (45%), and loss of edema (83%). Forty-nine percent of patients had more than one clinical benefit. The most common adverse effect was leukopenia, which occurred in 40% of patients. Only 15% of patients had nausea and/or vomiting, none of which was severe; 9% experienced alopecia, also generally mild. CONCLUSION: Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin offers a new alternative for treatment of patients who have experienced failure of standard chemotherapy for AIDS-KS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Northfelt, D. W., Dezube, B. J., Thommes, J. A., Miller, B. J., Fischl, M. A., Friedman-Kien, A., Kaplan, L. D., Du Mond, C., Mamelok, R. D., & Henry, D. H. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2445 · Cited by 649
Self-citationChanan-Khan, A., Szebeni, J., Savay, S., Liebes, L., Rafique, N. M., Alving, C. R., & Muggia, F. M. (2003) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg374 · Cited by 479
Metadata
- Authors
- Northfelt, D. W., Dezube, B. J., Thommes, J. A., Levine, R., Von Roenn, J. H., Dosik, G. M., Rios, A., Krown, S. E., DuMond, C., & Mamelok, R. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 653-659
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1846163577
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.2.653
- The paper
- Northfelt, D. W., Dezube, B. J., Thommes, J. A., Levine, R., Von Roenn, J. H., Dosik, G. M., Rios, A., Krown, S. E., DuMond, C., & Mamelok, R. D. (1997). Efficacy of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma after failure of standard chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.2.653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.