Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 552

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules.

Lowe, V J, Fletcher, J W, Gobar, L, Lawson, M, Kirchner, P, Valk, P, Karis, J, Hubner, K, Delbeke, D, Heiberg, E V, Patz, E F, Coleman, R E·1998·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are commonly identified by chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT). Biopsies are often performed to evaluate the nodules further. An accurate, noninvasive diagnostic test could avoid the morbidity and costs of invasive tissue sampling. We evaluated the ability of fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to discriminate between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules in a prospective, multicenter trial. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients who had newly identified indeterminate SPNs on chest radiographs and CT were evaluated with FDG-PET. PET data were analyzed semiquantitatively by calculating standardized uptake values (SUVs) as an index of FDG accumulation and also by a visual scoring method. PET results were compared with pathology results. RESULTS: Sixty SPNs were malignant and 29 were benign. Using SUV data, PET had an overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of malignant nodules of 92% and 90%. Visual analysis provided a slightly higher, but not statistically significant, sensitivity of 98% and lower specificity of 69%. For SPNs < or = 1.5 cm (34 of 89), the sensitivity and specificity of SUV and visual analysis were 80% and 95% and 100% and 74%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET can accurately characterize indeterminate SPNs. PET imaging provides a noninvasive method to evaluate indeterminate SPNs, which can reduce the need for invasive tissue biopsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1998.16.3.1075

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 552

Metadata

Authors
Lowe, V. J., Fletcher, J. W., Gobar, L., Lawson, M., Kirchner, P., Valk, P., Karis, J., Hubner, K., Delbeke, D., Heiberg, E. V., Patz, E. F., & Coleman, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1998-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
1075-1084
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1951726892
Cited by
552
References
0
FWCI
32.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.3.1075
The paper
Lowe, V. J., Fletcher, J. W., Gobar, L., Lawson, M., Kirchner, P., Valk, P., Karis, J., Hubner, K., Delbeke, D., Heiberg, E. V., Patz, E. F., & Coleman, R. E. (1998). Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.3.1075

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.