The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are commonly identified by chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT). Biopsies are often performed to evaluate the nodules further. An accurate, noninvasive diagnostic test could avoid the morbidity and costs of invasive tissue sampling. We evaluated the ability of fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to discriminate between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules in a prospective, multicenter trial. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients who had newly identified indeterminate SPNs on chest radiographs and CT were evaluated with FDG-PET. PET data were analyzed semiquantitatively by calculating standardized uptake values (SUVs) as an index of FDG accumulation and also by a visual scoring method. PET results were compared with pathology results. RESULTS: Sixty SPNs were malignant and 29 were benign. Using SUV data, PET had an overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of malignant nodules of 92% and 90%. Visual analysis provided a slightly higher, but not statistically significant, sensitivity of 98% and lower specificity of 69%. For SPNs < or = 1.5 cm (34 of 89), the sensitivity and specificity of SUV and visual analysis were 80% and 95% and 100% and 74%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET can accurately characterize indeterminate SPNs. PET imaging provides a noninvasive method to evaluate indeterminate SPNs, which can reduce the need for invasive tissue biopsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 943
Evaluation of Patients With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?
Gould, M. K., Fletcher, J., Iannettoni, M. D., Lynch, W. R., Midthun, D. E., Naidich, D. P., & Ost, D. E. (2007) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.07-1353 · Cited by 503
Self-citationBlodgett, T. M., Meltzer, C. C., & Townsend, D. W. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2422051113 · Cited by 387
Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Whole-Body PET
Marom, E. M., McAdams, H. P., Erasmus, J. J., Goodman, P. C., Culhane, D. K., Coleman, R. E., Herndon, J. E., & Patz, E. F. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se21803 · Cited by 384
Self-citationSugawara, Y., Zasadny, K. R., Neuhoff, A. W., & Wahl, R. L. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv37521 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowe, V. J., Fletcher, J. W., Gobar, L., Lawson, M., Kirchner, P., Valk, P., Karis, J., Hubner, K., Delbeke, D., Heiberg, E. V., Patz, E. F., & Coleman, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1075-1084
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1951726892
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.3.1075
- The paper
- Lowe, V. J., Fletcher, J. W., Gobar, L., Lawson, M., Kirchner, P., Valk, P., Karis, J., Hubner, K., Delbeke, D., Heiberg, E. V., Patz, E. F., & Coleman, R. E. (1998). Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.3.1075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.