The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Whole-Body PET
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracies of whole-body 2-[fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and conventional imaging (thoracic computed tomography [CT], bone scintigraphy, and brain CT or magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) in staging bronchogenic carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within 20 months, 100 patients with newly diagnosed bronchogenic carcinoma underwent whole-body FDG PET and chest CT. Ninety of these patients underwent radionuclide bone scintigraphy, and 70 patients underwent brain CT or MR imaging. For each patient, all examinations were completed within 1 month. A radiologic stage was assigned by using PET and conventional imaging independently and was compared with the pathologic stage. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: PET staging was accurate in 83 (83%) patients; conventional imaging staging was accurate in 65 (65%) patients (P < .005). Staging with mediastinal lymph nodes was correct by using PET in 67 (85%) patients and by using CT in 46 (58%) patients (P < .001). Nine (9%) patients had metastases demonstrated by using PET that were not found with conventional imaging, whereas 10 (10%) patients suspected of having metastases because of conventional imaging findings were correctly shown with PET to not have metastases. CONCLUSION: Whole-body PET was more accurate than thoracic CT, bone scintigraphy, and brain CT or MR imaging in staging bronchogenic carcinoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer
Mountain, C. F. (1997) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.111.6.1710 · Cited by 4,565
Landis, S. H., Murray, T., Bolden, S., & Wingo, P. A. (1998) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.48.1.6 · Cited by 2,341
Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules.
Lowe, V. J., Fletcher, J. W., Gobar, L., Lawson, M., Kirchner, P., Valk, P., Karis, J., Hubner, K., Delbeke, D., Heiberg, E. V., et al. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.3.1075 · Cited by 552
Self-citationPerformance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner.
DeGrado, T. R., Turkington, T. G., Williams, J. J., Stearns, C. W., Hoffman, J. M., & Coleman, R. E. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 515
Self-citationFocal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning.
Patz, E. F., Lowe, V. J., Hoffman, J. M., Paine, S. S., Burrowes, P., Coleman, R. E., & Goodman, P. C. (1993) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327702 · Cited by 511
Self-citationAbdel-Nabi, H., Doerr, R. J., Lamonica, D. M., Cronin, V. R., Galantowicz, P. J., Carbone, G. M., & Spaulding, M. B. (1998) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494497 · Cited by 424
Steinert, H. C., Hauser, M., Allemann, F., Engel, H., Berthold, T., von Schulthess, G. K., & Weder, W. (1997) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015071 · Cited by 376
Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas using CT attenuation values.
Korobkin, M., Brodeur, F. J., Yutzy, G. G., Francis, I. R., Quint, L. E., Dunnick, N. R., & Kazerooni, E. A. (1996) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623622 · Cited by 365
Erasmus, J. J., Patz, E. F., McAdams, H. P., Murray, J. G., Herndon, J., Coleman, R. E., & Goodman, P. C. (1997) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129444 · Cited by 333
Self-citationStaging non—small cell lung cancer by whole-body positron emission tomographic imaging
Valk, P. E., Pounds, T. R., Hopkins, D. M., Haseman, M. K., Hofer, G. A., Greiss, H. B., Myers, R. W., & Lutrin, C. L. (1995) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00752-0 · Cited by 316
Cited by
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 943
Antoch, G., Saoudi, N., Kuehl, H., Dahmen, G., Mueller, S. P., Beyer, T., Bockisch, A., Debatin, J. F., & Freudenberg, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.08.120 · Cited by 435
Wu, Y., Li, P., Zhang, H., Shi, Y., Wu, H., Zhang, J., Qian, Y., Li, C., & Yang, J. (2013) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.27779 · Cited by 129
Marom, E. M., Aloia, T. A., Moore, M.-B., Hara, M., Herndon, J. E., Harpole, D. H., Goodman, P. C., & Patz, E. F. (2001) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00250-6 · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marom, E. M., McAdams, H. P., Erasmus, J. J., Goodman, P. C., Culhane, D. K., Coleman, R. E., Herndon, J. E., & Patz, E. F.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 212
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 803-809
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2098938754
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 18.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Whole-Body PET. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se21803
- The paper
- Marom, E. M., McAdams, H. P., Erasmus, J. J., Goodman, P. C., Culhane, D. K., Coleman, R. E., Herndon, J. E., & Patz, E. F. (1999). Staging Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Whole-Body PET. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se21803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
