Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions.

DeMario, M D, Ratain, M J·1998·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE AND METHODS: The expanding role of oral chemotherapy in oncology is suggested by the abundance of orally formulated agents currently in development. The pharmacoeconomic principles that drive oral drug formulation are discussed. Patient preference for oral therapy is identified as a second major impetus for the design of oral cytotoxics. While the rationale for oral formulations is apparent, substantial patient compliance and pharmacokinetic limitations have been identified for this route of administration. Specific aspects of bioavailability limitations and patient compliance are discussed. Relevant pharmacokinetic data for each orally formulated chemotherapy agent are compared and selected novel oral cytotoxics and cytotoxic modulators are discussed. RESULTS: A review of pharmacokinetic literature suggests substantial variability in bioavailability for many orally formulated cancer cytotoxics. While these findings are observed for all classes of oral drugs, the issue is especially critical for cancer chemotherapy, in which a narrow therapeutic index is frequently observed. Improved bioavailability and reduced interpatient biovariability are therefore desirable for new cytotoxic formulations. Pharmacologic manipulations to improve bioavailability and reduce costs are examined. CONCLUSION: Oral chemotherapy represents a fundamental change in contemporary oncology practice, driven by pharmacoeconomic issues, patient convenience, and the potential for improved patient quality of life. Novel cytostatic therapies that require protracted drug administration periods will also favor an oral formulation. While the use of oral chemotherapy may initially be limited to metastatic disease palliation, demonstration of equivalent efficacy would allow for its subsequent use in adjuvant settings. This efficacy is contingent on circumventing bioavailability limitations and patient noncompliance. The development of specific, low-toxicity inhibitors of CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and other drug metabolizing enzymes such as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase represents a major innovative step in the successful formulation of oral chemotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2557

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
DeMario, M. D., & Ratain, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1998-07
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
2557-2567
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1782483823
Cited by
293
References
0
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2557
The paper
DeMario, M. D., & Ratain, M. J. (1998). Oral chemotherapy: rationale and future directions. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.7.2557

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.