Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluating Para-aortic Nodal Metastasis in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Before Surgical Staging: A Surgicopathologic Study

Rose, Peter G., Adler, Lee P., Rodriguez, Michael, Faulhaber, Peter F., Abdul-Karim, Fadi W., Miraldi, Floro·1999·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning provides a novel means of imaging malignancies. This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate PET scanning in detecting para-aortic nodal metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma and no evidence of extrapelvic disease before planned surgical staging lymphadenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After 20 mCi of 2-[18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) were administered intravenously, the abdomen and pelvis were scanned. Continuous bladder irrigation was used to reduce artifact. Patients were classified by the presence or absence of FDG uptake in the primary tumor and in pelvic or para-aortic nodes. Para-aortic node metastases were classified as present or absent according to a standardized staging procedure. Pelvic node metastases were similarly classified in a subset of patients who underwent pelvic node resection. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with stage IIB (n = 6), IIIB (n = 24), and IVA (n = 2) tumors were studied. Fluorodeoxyglucose was taken up by 91% of the cervical tumors. Six of eight patients with positive para-aortic node metastasis had PET scan evidence of para-aortic nodal metastasis. One of the two false-negatives had only one microscopic focus of metastatic cancer. In the para-aortic nodes, PET scanning had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 75%, and a negative predictive value of 92%. Fluorodeoxyglucose para-aortic nodal uptake conferred a relative risk of 9.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 36.0) for para-aortic nodal metastasis. All 10 of 17 patients with metastasis were predicted by PET scanning (P < .001); five of these patients had abnormalities on computed tomographic scans. CONCLUSION: Cervical cancers have a high avidity for FDG. The use of PET-FDG scanning accurately predicts both the presence and absence of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastatic disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.41

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Rose, P. G., Adler, L. P., Rodriguez, M., Faulhaber, P. F., Abdul-Karim, F. W., & Miraldi, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1999-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
41-41
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1905461358
Cited by
345
References
0
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluating Para-aortic Nodal Metastasis in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Before Surgical Staging: A Surgicopathologic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.41
The paper
Rose, P. G., Adler, L. P., Rodriguez, M., Faulhaber, P. F., Abdul-Karim, F. W., & Miraldi, F. (1999). Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluating Para-aortic Nodal Metastasis in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Before Surgical Staging: A Surgicopathologic Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.41

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.