Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic Importance of the Standardized Uptake Value on 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of 125 Cases

Vansteenkiste, Johan F., Stroobants, Sigrid G., Dupont, Patrick J., De Leyn, Paul R., Verbeken, Erik K., Deneffe, Georges J., Mortelmans, Luc A., Demedts, Maurits G.·1999·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The amount of radio-labeled 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (FDG) uptake, a measurement of the increased glucose metabolism of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, has recently been correlated with proliferation capacity. The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV), a semi-quantitative measurement of FDG uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) scan, could thus be of prognostic significance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the follow-up of 125 potentially operable NSCLC patients, previously included in three of our prospective PET protocols. Performance status, maximal tumor diameter, tumor-cell type, SUV, and final staging were analyzed for their possible association with survival. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients had stage I or II NSCLC, 37 had stage IIIA, and 23 had stage IIIB. Treatment was complete resection in 91 cases. In a univariate analysis, performance status (P = .002), stage (P = .001), tumor diameter (P = .06), tumor-cell type (P = .03), and SUV greater than 7 (P = .001) were correlated with survival. For SUV, group dichotomy with a cut-off SUV of 7 had the best discriminative value for prognosis, both in the total and surgical cohort. A multivariate Cox analysis identified performance status (P = .02), stage (P = .01), and SUV (P = .007) as important for the prognosis. In the surgical group, patients with a resected tumor less than 3 cm had an expected 2-year survival of 86%, if the SUV was below 7, and 60%, if above 7. Nearly all resected tumors larger than 3 cm had SUV's greater than 7 and an expected 2-year survival of 43%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the FDG uptake in primary NSCLC on PET has an important prognostic value and could be complementary to other well-known factors in the decision on adjuvant treatment protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3201

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Vansteenkiste, J. F., Stroobants, S. G., Dupont, P. J., De Leyn, P. R., Verbeken, E. K., Deneffe, G. J., Mortelmans, L. A., & Demedts, M. G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1999-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
3201-3206
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1907938843
Cited by
439
References
0
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Importance of the Standardized Uptake Value on 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of 125 Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3201
The paper
Vansteenkiste, J. F., Stroobants, S. G., Dupont, P. J., De Leyn, P. R., Verbeken, E. K., Deneffe, G. J., Mortelmans, L. A., & Demedts, M. G. (1999). Prognostic Importance of the Standardized Uptake Value on 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Analysis of 125 Cases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.10.3201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.