The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Octreotide Acetate Long-Acting Formulation Versus Open-Label Subcutaneous Octreotide Acetate in Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome
Abstract
PURPOSE: Subcutaneous (SC) octreotide acetate effectively relieves the diarrhea and flushing associated with carcinoid syndrome but requires long-term multiple injections daily. A microencapsulated long-acting formulation (LAR) of octreotide acetate has been developed for once-monthly intramuscular dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized trial compared double-blinded octreotide LAR at 10, 20, and 30 mg every 4 weeks with open-label SC octreotide every 8 hours for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome. Seventy-nine patients controlled with treatment of SC octreotide 0.3 to 0.9 mg/d whose symptoms returned during a washout period and who returned for at least the week 20 evaluation constituted the efficacy-assessable population. RESULTS: Complete or partial treatment success was comparable in each of the four arms of the study (SC, 58.3%; 10 mg, 66.7%; 20 mg, 71.4%; 30 mg, 61.9%; P ≥ .72 for all pairwise comparisons). Control of stool frequency was similar in all treatment groups. Flushing episodes were best controlled in the 20-mg LAR and SC groups; the 10-mg LAR treatment was least effective in the control of flushing. Treatment was well tolerated by patients in all four groups. CONCLUSION: Once octreotide steady-state concentrations are achieved, octreotide LAR controls the symptoms of carcinoid syndrome at least as well as SC octreotide. A starting dose of 20 mg of octreotide LAR is recommended. Supplemental SC octreotide is needed for approximately 2 weeks after initiation of octreotide LAR treatment. Occasional rescue SC injections may be required for possibly 2 to 3 months until steady-state octreotide levels from the LAR formulation are achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ramage, J. K., Ahmed, A., Ardill, J., Bax, N., Breen, D. J., Caplin, M. E., Corrie, P., Davar, J., Davies, A. H., Lewington, V, et al. (2012) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300831 · Cited by 952
Current Status of Gastrointestinal Carcinoids
Modlin, I. M., Kidd, M., Latich, I., Zikusoka, M. N., & Shapiro, M. D. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.038 · Cited by 848
The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.
Kaltsas, G. A., Besser, G. M., & Grossman, A. B. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2003-0014 · Cited by 674
Recommended Guidelines for the Treatment of Cancer Treatment-Induced Diarrhea
Benson, A. B., Ajani, J. A., Catalano, R. B., Engelking, C., Kornblau, S. M., Martenson, J. A., McCallum, R., Mitchell, E. P., O'Dorisio, T. M., Vokes, E. E., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.04.132 · Cited by 631
Self-citationGastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Cives, M., & Strosberg, J. R. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21493 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubin, J., Ajani, J., Schirmer, W., Venook, A. P., Bukowski, R., Pommier, R., Saltz, L., Dandona, P., & Anthony, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 600-600
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1898402948
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Octreotide Acetate Long-Acting Formulation Versus Open-Label Subcutaneous Octreotide Acetate in Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.2.600
- The paper
- Rubin, J., Ajani, J., Schirmer, W., Venook, A. P., Bukowski, R., Pommier, R., Saltz, L., Dandona, P., & Anthony, L. (1999). Octreotide Acetate Long-Acting Formulation Versus Open-Label Subcutaneous Octreotide Acetate in Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.2.600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.