Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 641

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Chan, Stephen, Friedrichs, Kay, Noel, Daniel, Pintér, Tamàs, Van Belle, Simon, Vorobiof, Daniel, Duarte, Ricardo, Gil Gil, Miguel, Bodrogi, Istvan, Murray, Elizabeth, Yelle, Louise, von Minckwitz, Gunter, Korec, Stefan, Simmonds, Peter, Buzzi, Franco, González Mancha, Rosario, Richardson, Gary, Walpole, Euan, Ronzoni, Monica, Murawsky, Michael, Alakl, May, Riva, Alessandro, Crown, John·1999·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent–containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 or doxorubicin 75 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P = .008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2341

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 641

Metadata

Authors
Chan, S., Friedrichs, K., Noel, D., Pintér, T., Van Belle, S., Vorobiof, D., Duarte, R., Gil Gil, M., Bodrogi, I., Murray, E., Yelle, L., von Minckwitz, G., Korec, S., Simmonds, P., Buzzi, F., González Mancha, R., Richardson, G., Walpole, E., Ronzoni, M., Murawsky, M., Alakl, M., Riva, A., & Crown, J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1999-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
2341-2341
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2141056749
Cited by
641
References
2
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2341
The paper
Chan, S., Friedrichs, K., Noel, D., Pintér, T., Van Belle, S., Vorobiof, D., Duarte, R., Gil Gil, M., Bodrogi, I., Murray, E., Yelle, L., von Minckwitz, G., Korec, S., Simmonds, P., Buzzi, F., González Mancha, R., Richardson, G., Walpole, E., Ronzoni, M., . . . Crown, J. (1999). Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2341

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.