The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dysregulation of Apoptosis in Cancer
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Each day, approximately 50 to 70 billion cells perish in the average adult because of programmed cell death (PCD). Cell death in self-renewing tissues, such as the skin, gut, and bone marrow, is necessary to make room for the billions of new cells produced daily. So massive is the flux of cells through our bodies that, in a typical year, each of us will produce and, in parallel, eradicate a mass of cells equal to almost our entire body weight. The morphologic ritual cells go through when experiencing PCD has been termed apoptosis and is executed by a family of intracellular proteases, called caspases. Unlike accidental cell deaths caused by infarction and trauma, these physiologic deaths culminate in fragmentation of cells into membrane-encased bodies which are cleared through phagocytosis by neighboring cells without inciting inflammatory reactions or tissue scarring. Defects in the processes controlling PCD can extend cell life span, contributing to neoplastic cell expansion independently of cell division. Moreover, failures in normal apoptosis pathways contribute to carcinogenesis by creating a permissive environment for genetic instability and accumulation of gene mutations, promoting resistance to immune-based destruction, allowing disobeyance of cell cycle checkpoints that would normally induce apoptosis, facilitating growth factor/hormone–independent cell survival, supporting anchorage-independent survival during metastasis, reducing dependence on oxygen and nutrients, and conferring resistance to cytotoxic anticancer drugs and radiation. Elucidation of the genes that constitute the core machinery of the cell death pathway has provided new insights into tumor biology, revealing novel strategies for combating cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene
Toshiyuki, M., & Reed, J. C. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90412-3 · Cited by 4,063
Self-citationTwo CD95 (APO‐1/Fas) signaling pathways
Scaffidi, C., Fulda, S., Srinivasan, A., Friesen, C., Li, F., Tomaselli, K. J., Debatin, K., Krammer, P. H., & Peter, M. E. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.6.1675 · Cited by 3,000
Cited by
Vogelstein, B., Lane, D., & Levine, A. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042675 · Cited by 6,607
Blume-Jensen, P., & Hunter, T. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35077225 · Cited by 3,738
Johnstone (2002) · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00625-6 · Cited by 1,876
Histone-deacetylase inhibitors: novel drugs for the treatment of cancer
Johnstone, R. W. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd772 · Cited by 1,515
The BCL2 Family: Key Mediators of the Apoptotic Response to Targeted Anticancer Therapeutics
Hata, A. N., Engelman, J. A., & Faber, A. C. (2015) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0011 · Cited by 619
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2941-2941
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1870720170
- Cited by
- 987
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dysregulation of Apoptosis in Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.9.2941
- The paper
- Reed, J. C. (1999). Dysregulation of Apoptosis in Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.9.2941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.