Cited by 279Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchCancer-related Molecular PathwaysRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes

Eprenetapopt Plus Azacitidine in TP53 -Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase II Study by the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM)

Open access
Cluzeau, Thomas, Sebert, Marie, Rahmé, Ramy, Cuzzubbo, Stefania, Lehmann-Che, Jacqueline, Madelaine, Isabelle, Peterlin, Pierre, Bève, Blandine +18 more·2021·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: TP53-mutated ( TP53m) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have very poor outcome irrespective of the treatment received, including 40% responses (20% complete remission [CR]) with azacitidine (AZA) alone, short response duration, and a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 6 months. Eprenetapopt (APR-246), a novel first-in-class drug, leads to p53 protein reconformation and reactivates its proapoptotic and cell-cycle arrest functions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of eprenetapopt in combination with AZA in untreated high or very high International Prognostic Scoring System-R TP53m MDS and AML patients. RESULTS: Fifty-two TP53m patients (34 MDS, 18 AML [including seven with more than 30% blasts]) were enrolled. In MDS, we observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 62%, including 47% CR, with a median duration of response at 10.4 months. In AML, the ORR was 33% including 17% CR (27% and 0% CR in AML with less than and more than 30% marrow blasts, respectively). Seventy-three percent of responders achieved TP53 next-generation sequencing negativity (ie, variant allele frequency < 5%). The main treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (36%) and neurologic adverse events (40%), the latter correlating with a lower glomerular filtration rate at treatment onset ( P < .01) and higher age ( P = .05), and resolving with temporary drug interruption without recurrence after adequate eprenetapopt dose reduction. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months, median OS was 12.1 months in MDS, and 13.9 and 3.0 months in AML with less than and more than 30% marrow blasts, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this very high-risk population of TP53m MDS and AML patients, eprenetapopt combined with AZA was safe and showed potentially higher ORR and CR rate, and longer OS than reported with AZA alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.20.02342

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hematological and neurological toxicities, as well as impaired renal function, have been reported in patients receiving eprenetapopt.

    “Hematological and neurological toxicities, as well as impaired renal function, have been reported in patients receiving eprenetapopt (3, 4)”

    From Eprenetapopt triggers ferroptosis, inhibits NFS1 cysteine desulfurase, and synergizes with serine and glycine dietary restriction (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results (Safety; page not available) report hematologic toxicities and neurologic adverse events in patients receiving eprenetapopt plus azacitidine. They do not establish impaired renal function as a treatment toxicity: lower kidney function was associated with neurologic events, and the one reported case of renal failure was attributed to antibiotics. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both phase 1 clinical trials demonstrated that patients who responded to eprenetapopt and azacitidine had significantly improved overall survival compared to nonresponders.

    “Both phase 1 clinical trials demonstrated that patients who responded to eprenetapopt and azacitidine had significantly improved overall survival compared to nonresponders (3, 4)”

    From Eprenetapopt triggers ferroptosis, inhibits NFS1 cysteine desulfurase, and synergizes with serine and glycine dietary restriction (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results > Survival section (page unavailable) reports significantly longer overall survival in responders than nonresponders (15.6 versus 3.8 months; P < .0001). But this source reports that finding from its own phase II trial, not a phase 1 trial, and it does not establish the finding for both trials named in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Knowing CIP2A status in recurrent ovarian tumors may help predict clinical response to APR-246.

    “These results indicate that diagnostic identification of CIP2A status in recurrent OvCa tumors could have predictive potential for these patients regarding clinical responsiveness to APR-246 currently in clinical development (22,23).”
  • In a drug screen comparing HEY control and CIP2A-silenced cells, APR-246 was the most apparent sensitizer, reducing viability by more than 50% in CIP2A-silenced cells while control cells were practically insensitive.

    “The most apparent sensitization effect was observed with APR-246 (PRIMA-1Met/Eprenetapopt) (15,19–22). Whereas HEY-CTLshRNA cells were practically insensitive to APR-246, HEY-CIP2AshRNA cells showed a >50% reduction in cell viability (Fig. 1A).”
  • The paper previously reported Phase 2 results of two parallel trials of APR-246 + AZA with similar improvements in CR rates and favorable outcomes versus historical cohorts.

    “We previously reported the Phase 2 results of two parallel trials of APR‐246 + AZA with similar improvements in CR rates and favorable outcomes versus historical cohorts.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 279

Authors
Cluzeau, T., Sebert, M., Rahmé, R., Cuzzubbo, S., Lehmann-Che, J., Madelaine, I., Peterlin, P., Bève, B., Attalah, H., Chermat, F., Miekoutima, E., Rauzy, O. B., Recher, C., Stamatoullas, A., Willems, L., Raffoux, E., Berthon, C., Quesnel, B., Loschi, M., Carpentier, A. F., Sallman, D. A., Komrokji, R., Walter-Petrich, A., Chevret, S., Ades, L., & Fenaux, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • GFM
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Pharmacy Department, Hospital Saint Louis, APHP, Paris, France
  • Grupo de Física Matemática (PT)
  • Centre Henri Becquerel (FR)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • SBIM, Hospital Saint Louis, APHP, and Paris University, Paris, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR)
Corresponding author
Fenaux, Pierre
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-05-10
Volume
39
Issue
14
Pages
1575-1583
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3131928636
Cited by
279
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
32.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-IBHU-0003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Keywords
APR-246, azacitidine, TP53 mutation, myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, p53 reactivation, combination therapy, complete remission, variant allele frequency, febrile neutropenia, neurological adverse events, overall survival, very high-risk patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Azacitidine, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Quinuclidines, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review