Cited by 169Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Personalized prediction model to risk stratify patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Open access
Nazha, Aziz, Komrokji, Rami, Meggendorfer, Manja, Jia, Xuefei, Radakovich, Nathan, Shreve, Jacob, Hilton, C. Beau, Nagata, Yasunubo +19 more·2021·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a survival that can range from months to decades. Prognostic systems that incorporate advanced analytics of clinical, pathologic, and molecular data have the potential to more accurately and dynamically predict survival in patients receiving various therapies. METHODS: A total of 1,471 MDS patients with comprehensively annotated clinical and molecular data were included in a training cohort and analyzed using machine learning techniques. A random survival algorithm was used to build a prognostic model, which was then validated in external cohorts. The accuracy of the proposed model, compared with other established models, was assessed using a concordance (c)index. RESULTS: . The algorithm identified chromosomal karyotype, platelet, hemoglobin levels, bone marrow blast percentage, age, other clinical variables, seven discrete gene mutations, and mutation number as having prognostic impact on overall and leukemia-free survivals. The model was validated in an independent external cohort of 465 patients, a cohort of patients with MDS treated in a prospective clinical trial, a cohort of patients with paired samples at different time points during the disease course, and a cohort of patients who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. CONCLUSION: A personalized prediction model on the basis of clinical and genomic data outperformed established prognostic models in MDS. The new model was dynamic, predicting survival and leukemia transformation probabilities at different time points that are unique for a given patient, and can upstage and downstage patients into more appropriate risk categories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.20.02810

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TET2 mutations are the most frequent single-gene mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome.

    “Moreover, TET2 mutations are the most frequent single-gene mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), an age-related hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) disease.9”

    From Aging drives <i>Tet2</i> <i>+/−</i> clonal hematopoiesis via IL-1 signaling (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The mutation table in the indexed copy (section labeled “Validations of the New Model in Different Settings”; page unavailable) lists SF3B1 in 369 patients and TET2 in 363. The paper identifies TET2 as commonly mutated, but its cohort data do not make it the most frequent single-gene mutation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nazha, A., Komrokji, R., Meggendorfer, M., Jia, X., Radakovich, N., Shreve, J., Hilton, C. B., Nagata, Y., Hamilton, B. K., Mukherjee, S., Al Ali, N., Walter, W., Hutter, S., Padron, E., Sallman, D., Kuzmanovic, T., Kerr, C., Adema, V., Steensma, D. P., Dezern, A., Roboz, G., Garcia-Manero, G., Erba, H., Haferlach, C., Maciejewski, J. P., Haferlach, T., & Sekeres, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Munich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) (DE)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
  • MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany
  • Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
  • SWOG Cooperative Group, Houston, TX
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-11-20
Volume
39
Issue
33
Pages
3737-3746
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3194326451
Cited by
169
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
19.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K12CA076917, U10CA180888)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
myelodysplastic syndrome, prognostic model, survival prediction, leukemia-free survival, risk stratification, random survival forest, genetic mutations, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, leukemic transformation, personalized prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Models, Statistical, Survival Rate, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Disease Progression, Genomics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review