Personalized prediction model to risk stratify patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a survival that can range from months to decades. Prognostic systems that incorporate advanced analytics of clinical, pathologic, and molecular data have the potential to more accurately and dynamically predict survival in patients receiving various therapies. METHODS: A total of 1,471 MDS patients with comprehensively annotated clinical and molecular data were included in a training cohort and analyzed using machine learning techniques. A random survival algorithm was used to build a prognostic model, which was then validated in external cohorts. The accuracy of the proposed model, compared with other established models, was assessed using a concordance (c)index. RESULTS: . The algorithm identified chromosomal karyotype, platelet, hemoglobin levels, bone marrow blast percentage, age, other clinical variables, seven discrete gene mutations, and mutation number as having prognostic impact on overall and leukemia-free survivals. The model was validated in an independent external cohort of 465 patients, a cohort of patients with MDS treated in a prospective clinical trial, a cohort of patients with paired samples at different time points during the disease course, and a cohort of patients who underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. CONCLUSION: A personalized prediction model on the basis of clinical and genomic data outperformed established prognostic models in MDS. The new model was dynamic, predicting survival and leukemia transformation probabilities at different time points that are unique for a given patient, and can upstage and downstage patients into more appropriate risk categories.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TET2 mutations are the most frequent single-gene mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome.
“Moreover, TET2 mutations are the most frequent single-gene mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), an age-related hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) disease.9”
From Aging drives <i>Tet2</i> <i>+/−</i> clonal hematopoiesis via IL-1 signaling (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The mutation table in the indexed copy (section labeled “Validations of the New Model in Different Settings”; page unavailable) lists SF3B1 in 369 patients and TET2 in 363. The paper identifies TET2 as commonly mutated, but its cohort data do not make it the most frequent single-gene mutation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Arber, D. A., Orazi, A., Hasserjian, R., Thiele, J., Borowitz, M. J., Le Beau, M. M., Bloomfield, C. D., Cazzola, M., & Vardiman, J. W. (2016) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544 · Cited by 10,119 · see citing works
International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes
Greenberg, P., Cox, C., LeBeau, M. M., Fenaux, P., Morel, P., Sanz, G., Sanz, M., Vallespi, T., Hamblin, T., Oscier, D., et al. (1997) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v89.6.2079 · Cited by 4,427 · see citing works
Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Haferlach, T., Nagata, Y., Grossmann, V, Okuno, Y., Bacher, U., Nagae, G., Schnittger, S., Sanada, M., Kon, A., Alpermann, T., et al. (2014) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2013.336 · Cited by 1,532 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Bernard, E., Tuechler, H., Greenberg, P. L., Hasserjian, R. P., Arango Ossa, J. E., Nannya, Y., Devlin, S. M., Creignou, M., Pinel, P., Monnier, L., et al. (2022) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidoa2200008 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Aging drives <i>Tet2</i> <i>+/−</i> clonal hematopoiesis via IL-1 signaling
Caiado, F., Kovtonyuk, L. V., Gonullu, N. G., Fullin, J., Boettcher, S., & Manz, M. G. (2023) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2022016835 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Stengel, A., Meggendorfer, M., Walter, W., Baer, C., Nadarajah, N., Hutter, S., Kern, W., Haferlach, T., & Haferlach, C. (2023) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010312 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence across the cancer care continuum
Riaz, I. B., Khan, M. A., & Osterman, T. J. (2025) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.70050 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nazha, A., Komrokji, R., Meggendorfer, M., Jia, X., Radakovich, N., Shreve, J., Hilton, C. B., Nagata, Y., Hamilton, B. K., Mukherjee, S., Al Ali, N., Walter, W., Hutter, S., Padron, E., Sallman, D., Kuzmanovic, T., Kerr, C., Adema, V., Steensma, D. P., Dezern, A., Roboz, G., Garcia-Manero, G., Erba, H., Haferlach, C., Maciejewski, J. P., Haferlach, T., & Sekeres, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Munich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) (DE)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Harvard University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- SWOG Cooperative Group, Houston, TX
- University of Miami (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2021-11-20
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 3737-3746
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC8601291
- OpenAlex
- W3194326451
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 19.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (K12CA076917, U10CA180888)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Keywords
- myelodysplastic syndrome, prognostic model, survival prediction, leukemia-free survival, risk stratification, random survival forest, genetic mutations, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, leukemic transformation, personalized prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Tumor, Models, Statistical, Survival Rate, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Disease Progression, Genomics, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review