Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biologic Correlates of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Human Breast Cancer Measured by Positron Emission Tomography

Reinhard Bos, Jacobus J. M. van der Hoeven, Elsken van der Wall, Petra van der Groep, Paul J. van Diest, E. F. I. Comans, Urvi Joshi, Gregg L. Semenza, Otto S. Hoekstra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Carla F.M. Molthoff·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Variable uptake of the glucose analog (18)fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been noticed in positron emission tomography (PET) studies of breast cancer patients, with low uptake occurring especially in lobular cancer. At present, no satisfactory biologic explanation exists for this phenomenon. This study compared (18)FDG uptake in vivo with biomarkers expected to be involved in the underlying biologic mechanisms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative (18)FDG-PET scans were performed in 55 patients. (18)FDG activity was assessed visually by three observers using a four-point score. Tumor sections were stained by immunohistochemistry for glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1); Hexokinase (HK) I, II, and III; macrophages; hypoxia-inducible factor-1-alfa (HIF-1alpha); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF(165)); and microvessels. Mitotic activity index (MAI), amount of necrosis, number of lymphocytes, and tumor cells/volume were assessed. RESULTS: There were positive correlations between (18)FDG uptake and Glut-1 expression (P <.001), MAI (P =.001), amount of necrosis (P =.010), number of tumor cells/volume (P =.009), expression of HK I (P =.019), number of lymphocytes (P =.032), and microvessel density (r =.373; P =.005). HIF-1alpha, VEGF(165), HK II, HK III, and macrophages showed no univariate correlation with (18)FDG. In logistic regression, however, HIF-1alpha and HK II added value to MAI and Glut-1. CONCLUSION: (18)FDG uptake in breast cancer is a function of microvasculature for delivering nutrients, Glut-1 for transportation of (18)FDG into the cell, HK for entering (18)FDG into glycolysis, number of tumor cells/volume, proliferation rate (also reflected in necrosis), number of lymphocytes (not macrophages), and HIF-1alpha for upregulating Glut-1. Together, these features explain why breast cancers vary in (18)FDG uptake and elucidate the low uptake in lobular breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1200/jco.20.2.379

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 591

Metadata

Authors
Bos, R., van der Hoeven, J. J. M., van der Wall, E., van der Groep, P., van Diest, P. J., Comans, E. F. I., Joshi, U., Semenza, G. L., Hoekstra, O. S., Lammertsma, A. A., & Molthoff, C. F. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Published
2002-01-15
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
379-387
ISSN
0732-183X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118611962
Cited by
591
References
5
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biologic Correlates of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Human Breast Cancer Measured by Positron Emission Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.20.2.379
The paper
Bos, R., van der Hoeven, J. J. M., van der Wall, E., van der Groep, P., van Diest, P. J., Comans, E. F. I., Joshi, U., Semenza, G. L., Hoekstra, O. S., Lammertsma, A. A., & Molthoff, C. F. M. (2002). Biologic Correlates of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Human Breast Cancer Measured by Positron Emission Tomography. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.2.379

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.