The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) Phase III Trial of Combined-Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the local/regional control, survival, and toxicity of combined-modality therapy using high-dose (64.8 Gy) versus standard-dose (50.4 Gy) radiation therapy for the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 236 patients with clinical stage T1 to T4, N0/1, M0 squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma selected for a nonsurgical approach, after stratification by weight loss, primary tumor size, and histology, were randomized to receive combined-modality therapy consisting of four monthly cycles of fluorouracil (5-FU) (1,000 mg/m(2)/24 hours for 4 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) bolus day 1) with concurrent 64.8 Gy versus the same chemotherapy schedule but with concurrent 50.4 Gy. The trial was stopped after an interim analysis. The median follow-up was 16.4 months for all patients and 29.5 months for patients still alive. RESULTS: For the 218 eligible patients, there was no significant difference in median survival (13.0 v 18.1 months), 2-year survival (31% v 40%), or local/regional failure and local/regional persistence of disease (56% v 52%) between the high-dose and standard-dose arms. Although 11 treatment-related deaths occurred in the high-dose arm compared with two in the standard-dose arm, seven of the 11 deaths occurred in patients who had received 50.4 Gy or less. CONCLUSION: The higher radiation dose did not increase survival or local/regional control. Although there was a higher treatment-related mortality rate in the patients assigned to the high-dose radiation arm, it did not seem to be related to the higher radiation dose. The standard radiation dose for patients treated with concurrent 5-FU and cisplatin chemotherapy is 50.4 Gy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1056/NEJM199206113262403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00463-5 · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00463-5
- 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.149 · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.1.149
- 10.1214/aos/1176350951 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0021-9681(74)90015-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<988::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-U · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<988::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-u
- 10.1081/CNV-100000068 · doi:10.1081/cnv-100000068
Cited by
Stahl, M., Stuschke, M., Lehmann, N., Meyer, H.-J., Walz, M. K., Seeber, S., Klump, B., Budach, W., Teichmann, R., Schmitt, M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.034 · Cited by 1,314
Kato, K., Muro, K., Minashi, K., Ohtsu, A., Ishikura, S., Boku, N., Takiuchi, H., Komatsu, Y., Miyata, Y., & Fukuda, H. (2011) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.033 · Cited by 353
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers
Ajani, J. A., Barthel, J. S., Bentrem, D. J., D'Amico, T. A., Das, P., Denlinger, C. S., Fuchs, C. S., Gerdes, H., Glasgow, R. E., Hayman, J. A., et al. (2011) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2011.0072 · Cited by 331
Radiation-Induced Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanisms and Importance of Linear Energy Transfer
Sylvester, C. B., Abe, J.-I., Patel, Z. S., & Grande-Allen, K. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2018.00005 · Cited by 69
Radiogenomics predicts the expression of microRNA-1246 in the serum of esophageal cancer patients
Hoshino, I., Yokota, H., Ishige, F., Iwatate, Y., Takeshita, N., Nagase, H., Uno, T., & Matsubara, H. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59500-7 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Minsky, B. D., Pajak, T. F., Ginsberg, R. J., Pisansky, T. M., Martenson, J. A., Komaki, R. U., Okawara, G. S., Rosenthal, S. A., & Kelsen, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1167-1174
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2117223681
- Cited by
- 1,615
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) Phase III Trial of Combined-Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.20.5.1167
- The paper
- Minsky, B. D., Pajak, T. F., Ginsberg, R. J., Pisansky, T. M., Martenson, J. A., Komaki, R. U., Okawara, G. S., Rosenthal, S. A., & Kelsen, D. P. (2002). INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) Phase III Trial of Combined-Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: High-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Radiation Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.5.1167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.