Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,360

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens

Fossella, Frank V., DeVore, Russell, Kerr, Ronald N., Crawford, Jeffrey, Natale, Ronald R., Dunphy, Frank, Kalman, Leonard, Miller, Vincent, Lee, Jin Soo, Moore, Melvin, Gandara, David, Karp, Daniel, Vokes, Everett, Kris, Mark, Kim, Yong, Gamza, Francis, Hammershaimb, Luz, the TAX Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Study Group·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To confirm the promising phase II results of docetaxel monotherapy, this phase III trial was conducted of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously failed platinum-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 373 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 (D100) or 75 mg/m 2 (D75) versus a control regimen of vinorelbine or ifosfamide (V/I). The three treatment groups were well-balanced for key patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall response rates were 10.8% with D100 and 6.7% with D75, each significantly higher than the 0.8% response with V/I (P = .001 and P = .036, respectively). Patients who received docetaxel had a longer time to progression (P = .046, by log-rank test) and a greater progression-free survival at 26 weeks (P = .005, by χ 2 test). Although overall survival was not significantly different between the three groups, the 1-year survival was significantly greater with D75 than with the control treatment (32% v 19%; P = .025, by χ 2 test). Prior exposure to paclitaxel did not decrease the likelihood of response to docetaxel, nor did it impact survival. There was a trend toward greater efficacy in patients whose disease was platinum-resistant rather than platinum-refractory and in patients with performance status of 0 or 1 versus 2. Toxicity was greatest with D100, but the D75 arm was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: This first randomized trial in this setting demonstrates that D75 every 3 weeks can offer clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced NSCLC whose disease has relapsed or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.12.2354

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,360

Metadata

Authors
Fossella, F. V., DeVore, R., Kerr, R. N., Crawford, J., Natale, R. R., Dunphy, F., Kalman, L., Miller, V., Lee, J. S., Moore, M., Gandara, D., Karp, D., Vokes, E., Kris, M., Kim, Y., Gamza, F., Hammershaimb, L., & the TAX Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Study Group
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-06-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
2354-2362
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1839238860
Cited by
1,360
References
0
FWCI
58.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.12.2354
The paper
Fossella, F. V., DeVore, R., Kerr, R. N., Crawford, J., Natale, R. R., Dunphy, F., Kalman, L., Miller, V., Lee, J. S., Moore, M., Gandara, D., Karp, D., Vokes, E., Kris, M., Kim, Y., Gamza, F., Hammershaimb, L., & the TAX Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. (2000). Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.12.2354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.