The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive Function in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy have complained of difficulties in their ability to remember, think, and concentrate. This study assessed whether there are differences in cognitive function between breast cancer patients treated with standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy compared with healthy controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) were used to assess cognitive function and mood in a group of 107 women. The women consisted of 31 breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (group A), 40 breast cancer patients who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy a median of 2 years earlier (group B), and 36 healthy controls (group C). RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed statistically significant differences (P = .009) in overall cognitive function scores between groups A and C, with poorer function in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. These differences remained significant (P = .046) when controlling for age, education level, and menopausal status. More patients had moderate or severe cognitive impairment in groups A and B than in controls (P ≤ .002). There were no significant differences in POMS scores between the groups, suggesting that the differences seen in cognitive scores were unlikely to be because of mood disturbance. CONCLUSION: Cognitive differences were observed in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy compared with healthy controls. These differences did not seem to be caused by significant differences in mood disturbance between the two groups. If confirmed, these results have substantial implications for informed consent, counseling, and psychosocial support of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes
Ahles, T. A., & Saykin, A. J. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2073 · Cited by 916
(2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.13.979 · Cited by 893
Major depression after breast cancer: a review of epidemiology and treatment
Fann, J. R., Thomas-Rich, A. M., Katon, W. J., Cowley, D., Pepping, M., McGregor, B. A., & Gralow, J. (2008) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.10.008 · Cited by 586
Ganz, P. A., Kwan, L., Stanton, A. L., Krupnick, J. L., Rowland, J. H., Meyerowitz, B. E., Bower, J. E., & Belin, T. R. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh060 · Cited by 505
Carreira, H., Williams, R., Müller, M., Harewood, R., Stanway, S., & Bhaskaran, K. (2018) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djy177 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Brezden, C. B., Phillips, K.-A., Abdolell, M., Bunston, T., & Tannock, I. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2000-07-14
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2695-2701
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1847137107
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive Function in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2695
- The paper
- Brezden, C. B., Phillips, K.-A., Abdolell, M., Bunston, T., & Tannock, I. F. (2000). Cognitive Function in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.