Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 828

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase III Randomized Trial of Amifostine as a Radioprotector in Head and Neck Cancer

Brizel, David M., Wasserman, Todd H., Henke, Michael, Strnad, Vratislav, Rudat, Volkar, Monnier, Alain, Eschwege, Francois, Zhang, Jay, Russell, Lesley, Oster, Wolfgang, Sauer, Rolf·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer causes acute and chronic xerostomia and acute mucositis. Amifositine and its active metabolite, WR-1065, accumulate with high concentrations in the salivary glands. This randomized trial evaluated whether amifostine could ameliorate these side effects without compromising the effectiveness of radiotherapy in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were eligible. Primary end points included the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute xerostomia, grade ≥ 3 acute mucositis, and grade ≥ 2 late xerostomia and were based on the worst toxicity reported. Amifostine was administered (200 mg/m 2 intravenous) daily 15 to 30 minutes before irradiation. Radiotherapy was given once daily (1.8 to 2.0 Gy) to doses of 50 to 70 Gy. Whole saliva production was quantitated preradiotherapy and regularly during follow-up. Patients evaluated their symptoms through a questionnaire during and after treatment. Local-regional control was the primary antitumor efficacy end point. RESULTS: Nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and allergic reactions were the most common side effects. Fifty-three percent of the patients receiving amifostine had at least one episode of nausea and/or vomiting, but it only occurred with 233 (5%) of 4,314 doses. Amifostine reduced grade ≥ 2 acute xerostomia from 78% to 51% (P < .0001) and chronic xerostomia grade ≥ 2 from 57% to 34% (P = .002). Median saliva production was greater with amifostine (0.26 g v 0.10 g, P = .04). Amifostine did not reduce mucositis. With and without amifostine, 2-year local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 58% versus 63%, 53% versus 57%, and 71% versus 66%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Amifostine reduced acute and chronic xerostomia. Antitumor treatment efficacy was preserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.19.3339

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 828

Metadata

Authors
Brizel, D. M., Wasserman, T. H., Henke, M., Strnad, V., Rudat, V., Monnier, A., Eschwege, F., Zhang, J., Russell, L., Oster, W., & Sauer, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-10-19
Volume
18
Issue
19
Pages
3339-3345
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2157885764
Cited by
828
References
1
FWCI
40.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Randomized Trial of Amifostine as a Radioprotector in Head and Neck Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.19.3339
The paper
Brizel, D. M., Wasserman, T. H., Henke, M., Strnad, V., Rudat, V., Monnier, A., Eschwege, F., Zhang, J., Russell, L., Oster, W., & Sauer, R. (2000). Phase III Randomized Trial of Amifostine as a Radioprotector in Head and Neck Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.19.3339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.