The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HER-2/neu and p53 Expression Versus Tamoxifen Resistance in Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: An association between the overexpression of proto-oncogene HER-2/neu and resistance to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive primary and metastatic breast cancer has been suggested. We examine a possible interaction between HER-2/neu or p53 expression and tamoxifen effectiveness in patients with ER-positive, node-positive disease treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil in a large adjuvant chemotherapy trial (Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] 8541). Tamoxifen assignment was not randomized—physician discretion was used for premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Trial protocol then specified assignment to postmenopausal women with ER-positive tumors, although not all took tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CALGB 8541 assessed HER-2/neu expression in patients with ER-positive disease by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and amplification by differential polymerase chain reaction (PCR). IHC assessed expression of p53. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards models assessed tamoxifen–HER-2/neu status interactions and tamoxifen-p53 status interactions. RESULTS: HER-2/neu status was available for 651 patients with ER-positive disease; 650, 608, and 353 patients were assessed by IHC, PCR, and FISH, respectively. Approximately one half received tamoxifen. Reduction in risk of disease recurrence or death resulting from tamoxifen was approximately 37% (32% with overexpression and 39% with normal expression of HER-2/neu; n = 155 by IHC). The tamoxifen–HER-2/neu status interaction was not significant in multivariate analysis of all three HER-2/neu assessment methods. Tamoxifen-p53 interaction did not significantly predict outcome. CONCLUSION: Disease-free and overall survival benefit of tamoxifen in patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer does not depend on HER-2/neu or p53 status. Our data suggest that neither HER-2/neu nor p53 expression should be used to determine assignment of tamoxifen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trastuzumab — Mechanism of Action and Use in Clinical Practice
Hudis, C. A. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra043186 · Cited by 2,585
Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Gradishar, W. J., Anderson, B. O., Balassanian, R., Blair, S. L., Burstein, H. J., Cyr, A., Elias, A. D., Farrar, W. B., Forero, A., Giordano, S. H., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0012 · Cited by 1,609
Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance
Ring, A., & Dowsett, M. (2004) · Endocrine-Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc.1.00776 · Cited by 651
Arpino, G., Wiechmann, L., Osborne, C. K., & Schiff, R. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2006-0045 · Cited by 549
Jordan, V. C. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020450x · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Berry, D. A., Muss, H. B., Thor, A. D., Dressler, L., Liu, E. T., Broadwater, G., Budman, D. R., Henderson, I. C., Barcos, M., Hayes, D., & Norton, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2000-10-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3471-3479
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1820219315
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HER-2/neu and p53 Expression Versus Tamoxifen Resistance in Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.20.3471
- The paper
- Berry, D. A., Muss, H. B., Thor, A. D., Dressler, L., Liu, E. T., Broadwater, G., Budman, D. R., Henderson, I. C., Barcos, M., Hayes, D., & Norton, L. (2000). HER-2/neu and p53 Expression Versus Tamoxifen Resistance in Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.20.3471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.