Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phase I Study in Advanced Cancer Patients of a Diversified Prime-and-Boost Vaccination Protocol Using Recombinant Vaccinia Virus and Recombinant Nonreplicating Avipox Virus to Elicit Anti–Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immune Responses

Marshall, John L., Hoyer, Robert J., Toomey, Mary Ann, Faraguna, Kristen, Chang, Ping, Richmond, Ellen, Pedicano, James E., Gehan, Edmund, Peck, Ronald A., Arlen, Philip, Tsang, Kwong Y., Schlom, Jeffrey·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: This trial sought to determine, for the first time, the validity in human vaccinations of using two different recombinant vaccines in diversified prime-and-boost regimens to enhance T-cell responses to a tumor antigen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with advanced tumors expressing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were randomized to receive either recombinant vaccinia (rV)-CEA followed by three avipox-CEA vaccinations, or avipox-CEA (three times) followed by one rV-CEA vaccination. Subsequent vaccinations in both cohorts were with avipox-CEA. Immunologic monitoring was performed using a CEA peptide and the enzyme-linked immunospot assay for interferon gamma production. RESULTS: rV-CEA followed by avipox-CEA was superior to the reverse order in the generation of CEA-specific T-cell responses. Further increases in CEA-specific T-cell precursors were seen when local granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and low-dose interleukin (IL)-2 were given with subsequent vaccinations. The treatment was extremely well tolerated. Limited clinical activity was seen using vaccines alone in this patient population. Antibody production against CEA was also observed in some of the treated patients. CONCLUSION: rV-CEA was more effective in its role as a primer of the immune system; avipox-CEA could be given up to eight times with continued increases in CEA T-cell precursors. Future trials should use rV-CEA first followed by avipox-CEA. Vaccines specific to CEA are able to generate CEA-specific T-cell responses in patients without significant toxicity. T-cell responses using vaccines alone may be inadequate to generate significant anticancer objective responses in patients with advanced disease. Cytokines such as GM-CSF and IL-2 may play a key role in generating such responses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.23.3964

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Marshall, J. L., Hoyer, R. J., Toomey, M. A., Faraguna, K., Chang, P., Richmond, E., Pedicano, J. E., Gehan, E., Peck, R. A., Arlen, P., Tsang, K. Y., & Schlom, J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
18
Issue
23
Pages
3964-3973
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1960833366
Cited by
357
References
0
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I Study in Advanced Cancer Patients of a Diversified Prime-and-Boost Vaccination Protocol Using Recombinant Vaccinia Virus and Recombinant Nonreplicating Avipox Virus to Elicit Anti–Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immune Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.23.3964
The paper
Marshall, J. L., Hoyer, R. J., Toomey, M. A., Faraguna, K., Chang, P., Richmond, E., Pedicano, J. E., Gehan, E., Peck, R. A., Arlen, P., Tsang, K. Y., & Schlom, J. (2000). Phase I Study in Advanced Cancer Patients of a Diversified Prime-and-Boost Vaccination Protocol Using Recombinant Vaccinia Virus and Recombinant Nonreplicating Avipox Virus to Elicit Anti–Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immune Responses. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.23.3964

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.