The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) to pelvic radiation therapy (RT) will improve the survival of early-stage, high-risk patients with cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical stage IA 2, IB, and IIA carcinoma of the cervix, initially treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and who had positive pelvic lymph nodes and/or positive margins and/or microscopic involvement of the parametrium were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to receive RT or RT + CT. Patients in each group received 49.3 GY RT in 29 fractions to a standard pelvic field. Chemotherapy consisted of bolus cisplatin 70 mg/m 2 and a 96-hour infusion of fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m 2/d every 3 weeks for four cycles, with the first and second cycles given concurrent to RT. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1996, 268 patients were entered onto the study. Two hundred forty-three patients were assessable (127 RT + CT patients and 116 RT patients). Progression-free and overall survival are significantly improved in the patients receiving CT. The hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival in the RT only arm versus the RT + CT arm are 2.01 (P = .003) and 1.96 (P = .007), respectively. The projected progression-free survivals at 4 years is 63% with RT and 80% with RT + CT. The projected overall survival rate at 4 years is 71% with RT and 81% with RT + CT. Grades 3 and 4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity were more frequent in the RT + CT group. CONCLUSION: The addition of concurrent cisplatin-based CT to RT significantly improves progression-free and overall survival for high-risk, early-stage patients who undergo radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the cervix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gupta, S., Maheshwari, A., Parab, P., Mahantshetty, U., Hawaldar, R., Sastri (Chopra), S., Kerkar, R., Engineer, R., Tongaonkar, H., Ghosh, J., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.75.9985 · Cited by 459
Rose, P. G., Ali, S., Watkins, E., Thigpen, J. T., Deppe, G., Clarke-Pearson, D. L., & Insalaco, S. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.4532 · Cited by 284
Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC) (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008285 · Cited by 275
Al-Adra, D. P., Hammel, L., Roberts, J., Woodle, E. S., Levine, D., Mandelbrot, D., Verna, E., Locke, J., D’Cunha, J., Farr, M., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.16318 · Cited by 163
DiSilvestro, P. A., Ali, S., Craighead, P. S., Lucci, J. A., Lee, Y.-C., Cohn, D. E., Spirtos, N. M., Tewari, K. S., Muller, C., Gajewski, W. H., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.51.4265 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, W. A., Liu, P. Y., Barrett, R. J., Stock, R. J., Monk, B. J., Berek, J. S., Souhami, L., Grigsby, P., Gordon, W., & Alberts, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2000-04-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1606-1613
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2157719711
- Cited by
- 2,284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1606
- The paper
- Peters, W. A., Liu, P. Y., Barrett, R. J., Stock, R. J., Monk, B. J., Berek, J. S., Souhami, L., Grigsby, P., Gordon, W., & Alberts, D. S. (2000). Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.