The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Threshold for Adjuvant Therapy in Older Breast Cancer Patients?
Abstract
PURPOSE: To consider the question of when to prescribe adjuvant treatment for elderly breast cancer patients, particularly when comorbidities are present. Knowledge of the threshold relapse risks above which adjuvant treatment is worth prescribing would enhance decision making. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov analysis of data from the medical literature was conducted. Patients aged 65 to 85 years were considered, along with three levels of comorbidity. The threshold risk of relapse at 10 years (RR10), at which time treatment provides absolute reduction or reduction of an absolute 1% in relapse or mortality, was evaluated. RESULTS: The threshold RR10 for an absolute reduction in mortality risk by adjuvant treatment was low through the age of 85 years. However, for an absolute 1% reduction, the effect of treatment on relapse and the effect of treatment on mortality increasingly diverged. The threshold RR10 for an absolute 1% reduction in relapse risk remained fairly low (5% to 6% for tamoxifen, 12% to 19% for chemotherapy). The threshold RR10 for an absolute 1% reduction in mortality risk, although starting close to the RR10 for an absolute 1% reduction in relapse risk, rose sharply. For tamoxifen, the difference between the two was 4% for an average 65-year-old, 6% at the age of 75 years, and 15% at the age of 85 years. For chemotherapy, the differences were 6%, 12%, and 30%, respectively. Similarly, thresholds increased with increasing comorbidity. In older and sicker patients, the maximum benefit was reached after 5 years rather than 10 years. CONCLUSION: Older breast cancer patients can expect a reduction in relapse that is fairly similar to that of younger patients. However, the effect on mortality diverges markedly, and attention should be paid to this difference in clinical decision making. Comorbidity should be considered in recommendations for adjuvant treatment, including clinical practice guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.13.979 · Cited by 893
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer
Extermann, M., & Hurria, A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.10.6559 · Cited by 875
Self-citationEORTC elderly task force position paper: Approach to the older cancer patient
Pallis, A. G., Fortpied, C., Wedding, U., Van Nes, M. C., Penninckx, B., Ring, A., Lacombe, D., Monfardini, S., Scalliet, P., & Wildiers, H. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.022 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Extermann, M., Balducci, L., & Lyman, G. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2000-04-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1709-1717
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1759175391
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Threshold for Adjuvant Therapy in Older Breast Cancer Patients? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1709
- The paper
- Extermann, M., Balducci, L., & Lyman, G. H. (2000). What Threshold for Adjuvant Therapy in Older Breast Cancer Patients? Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.