The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinicopathologic Re-Evaluation of 100 Malignant Fibrous Histiocytomas: Prognostic Relevance of Subclassification
Abstract
PURPOSE: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) has been regarded as the most common soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults. Yet its true nature and the validity of this diagnostic concept have increasingly been questioned. Available data suggest that most patients with MFH can be subclassified into specific STS types, but the clinical relevance of such categorization has been argued. In a retrospective study, we reclassified 100 tumors of the extremity and trunk wall primarily diagnosed as MFH and analyzed the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were adults (median age, 70 years; range, 32 to 94 years). The median tumor size was 8 cm (range, 1 to 30 cm), and the thigh was the most common tumor location (n = 31). Median follow-up was 8 years (range, 3 to 16 years). The overall 5-year metastasis-free survival rate was 0.64. The tumors were reanalyzed histologically, immunohistochemically, and, where available, ultrastructurally, and were classified according to strict diagnostic criteria. Patients were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer system, and prognoses were compared among different groups of the reclassified diagnoses, paying special attention to myogenic tumors. RESULTS: In 84 of 100 tumors, a specific line of differentiation was either proved or strongly suggested. The most common diagnoses were myxofibrosarcoma (n = 22) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 20). Overall, 30 tumors could be grouped as some form of myogenic sarcoma. These tumors had a worse prognosis, even within the same American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and a shorter time to metastasis than nonmyogenic tumors. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study confirms that most so-called MFH can be subclassified by defined criteria; it provides evidence that such classification is clinically important. Specifically, pleomorphic STS showing myogenic differentiation are significantly more aggressive, a finding that allows planning future therapeutic trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Binh, M. B. N., Sastre-Garau, X., Guillou, L., Pinieux, G. D., Terrier, P., Lagacé, R., Aurias, A., Hostein, I., & Coindre, J. M. (2005) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000170343.09562.39 · Cited by 639
Gene expression profiling of human sarcomas: insights into sarcoma biology.
Baird, K., Davis, S., Antonescu, C. R., Harper, U. L., Walker, R. L., Chen, Y., Glatfelter, A. A., Duray, P. H., & Meltzer, P. S. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1699 · Cited by 353
RAS/MAPK pathway hyperactivation determines poor prognosis in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas
Serrano, C., Romagosa, C., Hernández‐Losa, J., Simonetti, S., Valverde, C., Moliné, T., Somoza, R., Pérez, M., Vélez, R., Vergés, R., et al. (2016) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29733 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Fletcher, C. D. M., Gustafson, P., Rydholm, A., Willén, H., & Åkerman, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-06-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3045-3050
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1880275688
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinicopathologic Re-Evaluation of 100 Malignant Fibrous Histiocytomas: Prognostic Relevance of Subclassification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.12.3045
- The paper
- Fletcher, C. D. M., Gustafson, P., Rydholm, A., Willén, H., & Åkerman, M. (2001). Clinicopathologic Re-Evaluation of 100 Malignant Fibrous Histiocytomas: Prognostic Relevance of Subclassification. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.12.3045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.