Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 639

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MDM2 and CDK4 Immunostainings Are Useful Adjuncts in Diagnosing Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Subtypes: A Comparative Analysis of 559 Soft Tissue Neoplasms With Genetic Data

Binh, Matthieu Bui Nguyen, Sastre-Garau, Xavier, Guillou, Louis, Pinieux, Gonzague de, Terrier, Philippe, Lagacé, Réal, Aurias, Alain, Hostein, Isabelle, Coindre, Jean Michel·2005·American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Abstract

Atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT-WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) may be difficult to distinguish from benign adipose tumors and from poorly differentiated sarcomas, respectively. Genetically, they are characterized by amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes on chromosome 12q13-15. We examined a series of 559 soft tissue tumors (44 ALT-WDLPS, 61 DDLPS, 49 benign adipose tumors, and 405 non-ALT-WDLPS/DDLPS sarcomas) for MDM2 and CDK4 expression using immunohistochemistry. MDM2 and CDK4 immunoexpressions were compared with gene amplification status (as assessed by quantitative PCR and/or comparative genomic hybridization) in 241 neoplasms. Most ALT-WDLPS/DDLPS expressed MDM2 (97%) and CDK4 (92%) as opposed to few benign adipose tumors (MDM2, 5%; CDK4, 2%) and a limited number of non-ALT-WDLSP/DDLPS sarcomas (MDM2, 19%; CDK4, 6%). The sensitivity and specificity of MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings in identifying ALT-WDLPS/DDLPS among other soft tissue tumors were 97% and 92%, and 83% and 95%, respectively. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings were particularly useful to separate ALT-WDLPS from the large group of differentiated adipose tumors, and to distinguish DDLPS from poorly differentiated sarcomas. A strong correlation was observed between MDM2 and CDK4 stainings and gene amplification status. In conclusion, MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings, which correlate with gene amplification, are helpful adjuncts to differentiate ALT-WDLPS from benign adipose tumors and to separate DDLPS from poorly differentiated sarcomas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.pas.0000170343.09562.39

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 639

Metadata

Authors
Binh, M. B. N., Sastre-Garau, X., Guillou, L., Pinieux, G. D., Terrier, P., Lagacé, R., Aurias, A., Hostein, I., & Coindre, J. M.
Venue
American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
2005-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1340-1347
ISSN
0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027059052
Cited by
639
References
32
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MDM2 and CDK4 Immunostainings Are Useful Adjuncts in Diagnosing Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Subtypes: A Comparative Analysis of 559 Soft Tissue Neoplasms With Genetic Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.pas.0000170343.09562.39
The paper
Binh, M. B. N., Sastre-Garau, X., Guillou, L., Pinieux, G. D., Terrier, P., Lagacé, R., Aurias, A., Hostein, I., & Coindre, J. M. (2005). MDM2 and CDK4 Immunostainings Are Useful Adjuncts in Diagnosing Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Subtypes: A Comparative Analysis of 559 Soft Tissue Neoplasms With Genetic Data. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000170343.09562.39

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.