The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combined Tamoxifen and Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Agonist Versus LHRH Agonist Alone in Premenopausal Advanced Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Four Randomized Trials
Abstract
PURPOSE: The logic behind the application of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists in combination with tamoxifen in premenopausal women is that LHRH agonists on the one hand suppress the tamoxifen-induced stimulation of the pituitary-ovarian function and, on the other hand, seem as effective as surgical castration. This meta-analysis combines all randomized evidence to compare the combined treatment with LHRH agonist alone with respect to overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response in premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four clinical trials randomizing a total of 506 premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer to LHRH agonist alone or to the combined treatment of LHRH agonist plus tamoxifen were identified. Meta-analytic techniques were used to analyze individual patient data from these trials. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6.8 years, there was a significant survival benefit (stratified log-rank test, P = .02; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.78) and progression-free survival benefit (stratified log-rank test, P = .0003; HR = 0.70) in favor of the combined treatment. The overall response rate was significantly higher on combined endocrine treatment (stratified Mantel Haenszel test, P = .03; odds ratio = 0.67). CONCLUSION: The combination of LHRH agonist plus tamoxifen is superior to LHRH agonist alone in premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Therefore, if a premenopausal woman with advanced breast cancer is thought to be suitable for endocrine treatment, it is proposed that the combination of a LHRH agonist plus tamoxifen be considered as the new standard treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials
(1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11423-4 · Cited by 4,085
Beatson, G. (1896) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)72384-7 · Cited by 1,608
Beatson, G. (1896) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)72307-0 · Cited by 1,282
Hortobagyi, G. N. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199810013391407 · Cited by 781
Survival Analysis: A Practical Approach.
Smith, P. J., Parmar, M. K. B., & David, M. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291609 · Cited by 730
Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer
Hayward, J. L., Carbone, P. P., Heusen, J. C., Kumaoka, S., Segaloff, A., & Rubens, R. D. (1977) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1977.42 · Cited by 705
Hayward, J. L., Carbone, P. P., Heuson, J.-C., Kumaoka, S., Segaloff, A., & Rubens, R. D. (1977) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197703)39:3<1289::aid-cncr2820390340>3.0.co;2-f · Cited by 623
Endocrine treatment of breast cancer in women
SANTEN, R. J., MANNI, A., HARVEY, H., & REDMOND, C. (1990) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-11-2-221 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Harbeck, N., & Gnant, M. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31891-8 · Cited by 2,280
Simmonds, M. C., Higginsa, J. P. T., Stewartb, L. A., Tierneyb, J. F., Clarke, M. J., & Thompson, S. G. (2005) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1191/1740774505cn087oa · Cited by 555
Patel, H. K., & Bihani, T. (2018) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.12.012 · Cited by 499
Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer
Love, R. R., Goldhirsch, A., Glick, J. H., Gelber, R. D., Coates, A. S., & Senn, H.-J. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.20.7.1955 · Cited by 414
Gnant, M., Mlineritsch, B., Luschin-Ebengreuth, G., Kainberger, F., Kässmann, H., Piswanger-Sölkner, J. C., Seifert, M., Ploner, F., Menzel, C., Dubsky, P., et al. (2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70204-3 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Klijn, J. G. M., Blamey, R. W., Boccardo, F., Tominaga, T., Duchateau, L., & Sylvester, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 343-353
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1829247853
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined Tamoxifen and Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Agonist Versus LHRH Agonist Alone in Premenopausal Advanced Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Four Randomized Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.343
- The paper
- Klijn, J. G. M., Blamey, R. W., Boccardo, F., Tominaga, T., Duchateau, L., & Sylvester, R. (2001). Combined Tamoxifen and Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) Agonist Versus LHRH Agonist Alone in Premenopausal Advanced Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Four Randomized Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.