Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of the Media and the Internet on Oncology: Survey of Cancer Patients and Oncologists in Canada

Chen, Xueyu, Siu, Lillian L.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the news media and the Internet as sources of medical information by patients and oncologists in Canada and to investigate the impact on patients’ treatment decisions and the patient-doctor relationship. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 2-week period, 191 ambulatory patients participated in the survey. Questionnaires were also mailed to Canadian oncologists: 410 of 686 questionnaires were returned (response rate = 60%). RESULTS: Of the 191 patients, 86% wanted as much information as possible about their illness, 54% reported receiving insufficient information, 83% cited physicians as their primary information source, and 7% cited the Internet. Seventy-one percent of patients actively searched for information, and 50% used the Internet. Patients’ opinions about the balance, accuracy, and relevance of news media reports were evenly split. English as the first language, access to the Internet, and use of alternative treatments predicted a higher rate of information seeking. Most oncologists routinely pay some attention to medical news and believe that it is difficult for patients to interpret medical information in the media and on the Internet accurately. Both patients and oncologists agree that information seeking does not affect the patient-physician relationship. CONCLUSION: Information searching is common among cancer patients in Canada. It does not affect the patient-doctor relationship. The media and the Internet are powerful means of medical information dissemination. Strategic efforts are needed to improve the quality of medical news reporting by the media, and to provide guidance for patients to understand their disease and interpret such information better.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.23.4291

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., & Siu, L. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
19
Issue
23
Pages
4291-4297
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1901693378
Cited by
262
References
3
FWCI
29.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of the Media and the Internet on Oncology: Survey of Cancer Patients and Oncologists in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.23.4291
The paper
Chen, X., & Siu, L. L. (2001). Impact of the Media and the Internet on Oncology: Survey of Cancer Patients and Oncologists in Canada. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.23.4291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.