The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of the Media and the Internet on Oncology: Survey of Cancer Patients and Oncologists in Canada
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the news media and the Internet as sources of medical information by patients and oncologists in Canada and to investigate the impact on patients’ treatment decisions and the patient-doctor relationship. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 2-week period, 191 ambulatory patients participated in the survey. Questionnaires were also mailed to Canadian oncologists: 410 of 686 questionnaires were returned (response rate = 60%). RESULTS: Of the 191 patients, 86% wanted as much information as possible about their illness, 54% reported receiving insufficient information, 83% cited physicians as their primary information source, and 7% cited the Internet. Seventy-one percent of patients actively searched for information, and 50% used the Internet. Patients’ opinions about the balance, accuracy, and relevance of news media reports were evenly split. English as the first language, access to the Internet, and use of alternative treatments predicted a higher rate of information seeking. Most oncologists routinely pay some attention to medical news and believe that it is difficult for patients to interpret medical information in the media and on the Internet accurately. Both patients and oncologists agree that information seeking does not affect the patient-physician relationship. CONCLUSION: Information searching is common among cancer patients in Canada. It does not affect the patient-doctor relationship. The media and the Internet are powerful means of medical information dissemination. Strategic efforts are needed to improve the quality of medical news reporting by the media, and to provide guidance for patients to understand their disease and interpret such information better.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications
Moynihan, R., Bero, L., Ross-Degnan, D., Henry, D., Lee, K., Watkins, J., Mah, C., & Soumerai, S. B. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006013422206 · Cited by 500
Eysenbach, G., Gray, J. A. M., Bonati, M., Arunachalam, S., Diepgen, T. L., Impicciatore, P., & Pandolfini, C. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1496 · Cited by 461
Johnson, T. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199807093390206 · Cited by 121
Cited by
Hesse, B. W., Nelson, D. E., Kreps, G. L., Croyle, R. T., Arora, N. K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618 · Cited by 1,523
McMullan, M. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006 · Cited by 1,106
How Internet Users Find, Evaluate, and Use Online Health Information: A Cross-Cultural Review
Morahan-Martin, J. M. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/1094931042403082 · Cited by 759
The impact of the internet on cancer outcomes.
Eysenbach, G. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356 · Cited by 573
Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., Catania, J., White, M., Zapert, K., & Turner, R. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X., & Siu, L. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4291-4297
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1901693378
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of the Media and the Internet on Oncology: Survey of Cancer Patients and Oncologists in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.23.4291
- The paper
- Chen, X., & Siu, L. L. (2001). Impact of the Media and the Internet on Oncology: Survey of Cancer Patients and Oncologists in Canada. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.23.4291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.