Cited by 1,106Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient–health professional relationship

McMullan, Miriam·2006·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective Health information is one of the most frequently sought topics on the Internet. A review of the literature was carried out to determine the use of the Internet for health information by the patient and how this could affect the patient-health professional relationship.Methods This study is a literature review, summarizing multiple empirical studies on a single subject and is not intended to be a meta-analysis.Results The review showed that the majority of health related Internet searches by patients are for specific medical conditions. They are carried out by the patient: (1) before the clinical encounter to seek information to manage their own healthcare independently and/or to decide whether they need professional help; (2) after the clinical encounter for reassurance or because of dissatisfaction with the amount of detailed information provided by the health professional during the encounter.Conclusion There has been a shift in the role of the patient from passive recipient to active consumer of health information. Health professionals are responding to the more 'Internet informed' patient in one or more of three ways: (1) the health professional feels threatened by the information the patient brings and responds defensively by asserting their 'expert opinion' (health professional-centred relationship). (2) The health professional and patient collaborate in obtaining and analysing the information (patient-centred relationship). (3) The health professional will guide patients to reliable health information websites (Internet prescription).Practice implications It is important that health professionals acknowledge patients' search for knowledge, that they discuss the information offered by patients and guide them to reliable and accurate health websites. It is recommended that courses, such as 'patient informatics' are integrated in health professionals' education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMullan, M.
Affiliations
University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
McMullan, Miriam
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
63
Issue
1-2
Pages
24-28
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143607388
Cited by
1,106
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 57
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
online health information seeking, patient-centered care, patient empowerment, health information websites, patient-provider partnership
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Communication, Humans, Information Services, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Internet, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review