Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Coadministration of Cyclosporine Strongly Enhances the Oral Bioavailability of Docetaxel

Malingré, Mirte M., Richel, Dick J., Beijnen, Jos H., Rosing, Hilde, Koopman, Franciska J., Ten Bokkel Huinink, Wim W., Schot, Margaret E., Schellens, Jan H.M.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oral bioavailability of docetaxel is very low, which is, at least in part, due to its affinity for the intestinal drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp). In addition, metabolism of docetaxel by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 in gut and liver may also contribute. The purpose of this study was to enhance the systemic exposure to oral docetaxel on coadministration of cyclosporine (CsA), an efficacious inhibitor of P-gp and substrate for CYP 3A4. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A proof-of-concept study was carried out in 14 patients with solid tumors. Patients received one course of oral docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 with or without a single oral dose of CsA 15 mg/kg. CsA preceded oral docetaxel by 30 minutes. During subsequent courses, patients received intravenous (IV) docetaxel 100 mg/m 2. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in patients who received oral docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 without CsA was 0.37 ± 0.33 mg·h/L and 2.71 ± 1.81 mg·h/L for the same oral docetaxel dose with CsA. The mean AUC of IV docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 was 4.41 ± 2.10 mg·h/L. The absolute bioavailability of oral docetaxel was 8% ± 6% without and 90% ± 44% with CsA. The oral combination of docetaxel and CsA was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of oral CsA strongly enhanced the oral bioavailability of docetaxel. Interpatient variability in the systemic exposure after oral drug administration was of the same order as after IV administration. These data are promising and form the basis for the further development of a clinically useful oral formulation of docetaxel.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.1160

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Malingré, M. M., Richel, D. J., Beijnen, J. H., Rosing, H., Koopman, F. J., Ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., Schot, M. E., & Schellens, J. H. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-02-15
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
1160-1166
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2155315199
Cited by
199
References
0
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coadministration of Cyclosporine Strongly Enhances the Oral Bioavailability of Docetaxel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.1160
The paper
Malingré, M. M., Richel, D. J., Beijnen, J. H., Rosing, H., Koopman, F. J., Ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., Schot, M. E., & Schellens, J. H. M. (2001). Coadministration of Cyclosporine Strongly Enhances the Oral Bioavailability of Docetaxel. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.4.1160

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.