The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision Support for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effects of an Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM on Treatment Decision, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM as a decision aid for breast cancer patients with a choice between breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy (MT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with stage I and II breast cancer were enrolled. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal, and pretest/posttest design was used. Follow-up was scheduled 3 and 9 months after discharge from the hospital. Control patients (n = 88) received standard care (oral information and brochures). The CDROM was provided to patients in the experimental condition (n = 92) as a supplement to standard procedures. Outcome variables were treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: No effect on treatment decision was found. CDROM patients expressed more general satisfaction with information at 3 and 9 months (95% confidence interval for the difference (d) between the means (d: 4.1 to 12.5 and 5.7 to 14.2 respectively). CDROM patients were also more satisfied with their treatment decision at 3 and at 9 months (d: 0.1 to 0.4; 0.2 to 0.5). Moreover, at 9 months, CDROM patients were more satisfied with breast cancer–specific information (d: 0.9 to 16.5), the decision-making process (d: 0.1 to 0.4), and communication (d: 0.2 to 11.0). At 3 and 9 months, a positive effect was found on general health (d: 0.2 to 14.5 and 0.3 to 15.0). Moreover, at 9 months, CDROM patients reported better physical functioning (d: 5.1 to 19.8), less pain (d: -17.9 to -4.5), and fewer arm symptoms (d: -14.1 to -0.5). CONCLUSION: The Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM improved decision making in patients with early-stage breast cancer with a choice between BCT and MT, as evaluated in terms of patients’ satisfaction and QoL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., Franzini, L., Williams, A., de Haes, H. C., Hopwood, P., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.10.2756 · Cited by 1,220
Self-citationTowle, A., Godolphin, W., Greenhalgh, T., & Gambrill, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.766 · Cited by 646
Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life
Street, R. L., & Voigt, B. (1997) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9701700306 · Cited by 258
Cited by
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Husson, O., Mols, F., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V. (2011) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq413 · Cited by 535
“Most patients tend to adjust well to their disease and it is therefore possible that additional gains in HRQoL are not easily achieved [30].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKnops, A. M., Legemate, D. A., Goossens, A., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & Ubbink, D. T. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182864fd6 · Cited by 231
Self-citationA taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems
Berlin, A., Sorani, M., & Sim, I. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.003 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Molenaar, S., Sprangers, M. A., Rutgers, E. J. T., Luiten, E. J., Mulder, J., Bossuyt, P. M., van Everdingen, J. J., Oosterveld, P., & de Haes, H. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-03-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1676-1687
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2139281308
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision Support for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effects of an Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM on Treatment Decision, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1676
- The paper
- Molenaar, S., Sprangers, M. A., Rutgers, E. J. T., Luiten, E. J., Mulder, J., Bossuyt, P. M., van Everdingen, J. J., Oosterveld, P., & de Haes, H. C. (2001). Decision Support for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effects of an Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM on Treatment Decision, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1676
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.