Cited by 535Cancer survivorship and carePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review

Open access
Husson, O., Mols, F., van de Poll-Franse, L.V.·2011·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Providing information that is congruent with patients' needs is an important determinant for patient satisfaction and might also affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and anxiety and depression levels of cancer survivors. DESIGN: The authors systematically reviewed the available literature on the relationship between information provision and HRQoL, anxiety and depression. A PubMed literature search for original articles published until February 2010 was carried out. Twenty-five articles, all conducted between 1996 and 2009, which met the predefined inclusion criteria, were subjected to a quality checklist. RESULTS: Satisfied patients, patients with fulfilled information needs, and patients who experience less information barriers, in general have a better HRQoL and less anxiety and depression. Out of eight intervention studies that aimed to improve information provision, only one showed a positive association with better HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Health care providers must pay more attention to patient-centred information provision. Additional research is needed to make definitive conclusions about information interventions as most results did not reach statistical significance due to methodological constraints. The quick development of the relatively young research field of patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivorship will make it possible to conduct better quality studies in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdq413

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological interventions before surgery have been observed to be a better coping strategy.

    “Psychological interventions before surgery have been observed to be a better coping strategy.”

    From Coping in Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer Survivors and Need for Intervention: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that an intervention might be more powerful if it includes counselling or psychotherapy. It does not report that psychological interventions before surgery were observed to improve coping; the proposed benefit is tentative, and neither the timing nor the coping outcome is established. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Providing sufficient information to breast cancer patients helps them understand trauma and anxiety, and they are more prepared for better HRQoL compared with women who do not have information.

    “Similarly, providing sufficient information to breast cancer patients helps them to understand the various aspects related to trauma and anxiety, and they are more prepared for better HRQoL when compared with women who do not have information.”

    From Coping in Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer Survivors and Need for Intervention: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    In the health-related quality of life section, the review reports that breast cancer patients who received clearer or higher levels of information had better reported QoL. The discussion suggests that information may improve understanding and help patients cope with cancer or reduce distress, but it does not establish that information helps women understand trauma and anxiety, or demonstrate the stated comparison with women who receive no information. Page numbers are unavailable in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husson, O., Mols, F., & van de Poll-Franse, L. V.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Husson, O.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
761-772
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126686082
Cited by
535
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research Award from the Dutch Cancer Society (UVT-2009-4349)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
information provision, cancer survivors, health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, patient-centered care, patient satisfaction, information needs, information barriers, patient-reported outcomes, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Health Status, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Survivors, Information Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review