Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When Is a Tumor Marker Ready for Prime Time? A Case Study of c-erb B-2 as a Predictive Factor in Breast Cancer

Yamauchi, Hideko, Stearns, Vered, Hayes, Daniel F.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: c-erbB-2 (HER-2, c-neu) might play a role as a predictive factor in breast cancer. However, the clinical utility of the marker in this disease is still not established. We conducted a critical analysis of the literature, in which we reviewed the factors that contribute to the lack of acceptance of c-erbB-2 for clinical use and attempted to determine the predictive role of c-erbB-2 for response to specific therapies. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE literature search using the keywords c-erbB-2, HER2, neu, and breast cancer, reviewed the references included in each publication, and reviewed abstracts that have been reported in the 1997-2000 proceedings to the American Association of Cancer Research and American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings. RESULTS: The preclinical and clinical data reported to date suggest that amplification or overexpression of c-erbB-2 is a weak to moderate negative pure prognostic factor. c-erbB-2 seems to be a weak to moderate negative predictive factor for response to endocrine therapy. The marker is also a moderate negative predictive factor for response to alkylating agents and a moderate positive predictive factor for response to anthracyclines. The data regarding response to taxanes or radiotherapy are not sufficient to make recommendations regarding treatment decision making. Finally, c-erbB-2 is a strong predictive factor for response to trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, in the adjuvant setting, c-erbB-2 status should not be used to determine whether a woman should receive adjuvant systemic therapy (weak prognostic factor). In addition, c-erbB-2 status should not be used to determine whether a patient should receive endocrine therapy. When adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended, anthracycline-based therapy should be the preferred regimen for c-erbB-2–positive patients. However, when anthracyclines are contraindicated, alkylating agent–based therapy should not be withheld. To determine the true predictive role and strength of the marker for response to each therapy, prospective randomized clinical trials or formal meta-analyses are required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.8.2334

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Yamauchi, H., Stearns, V., & Hayes, D. F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-04-15
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
2334-2356
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1919384911
Cited by
291
References
72
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Is a Tumor Marker Ready for Prime Time? A Case Study of c-erb B-2 as a Predictive Factor in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.8.2334
The paper
Yamauchi, H., Stearns, V., & Hayes, D. F. (2001). When Is a Tumor Marker Ready for Prime Time? A Case Study of c-erb B-2 as a Predictive Factor in Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.8.2334

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.