Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Concurrent Chemotherapy-Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Progression-Free Survival Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial

Chan, A.T.C., Teo, P.M.L., Ngan, R.K., Leung, T.W., Lau, W.H., Zee, B., Leung, S.F., Cheung, F.Y., Yeo, W., Yiu, H.H., Yu, K.H., Chiu, K.W., Chan, D.T., Mok, T., Yuen, K.T., Mo, F., Lai, M., Kwan, W.H., Choi, P., Johnson, P.J.·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is highly sensitive to both radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. This randomized phase III trial compared concurrent cisplatin-RT (CRT) with RT alone in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Ho’s N2 or N3 stage or N1 stage with nodal size ≥ 4 cm were randomized to receive cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 weekly up to 8 weeks concurrently with radical RT (CRT) or RT alone. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Three hundred fifty eligible patients were randomized. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both arms. There were significantly more toxicities, including mucositis, myelosuppression, and weight loss in the CRT arm. There were no treatment-related deaths in the CRT arm, and one patient died during treatment in the RT-alone arm. At a median follow-up of 2.71 years, the 2-year PFS was 76% in the CRT arm and 69% in the RT-alone arm (P = .10) with a hazards ratio of 1.367 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.00). The treatment effect had a significant covariate interaction with tumor stage, and a subgroup analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference in favor of the CRT arm in Ho’s stage T3 (P = .0075) with a hazards ratio of 2.328 (95% CI, 1.26 to 4.28). For T3 stage, the time to first distant failure was statistically significantly different in favor of the CRT arm (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Concurrent CRT is well tolerated in patients with advanced NPC in endemic areas. Although PFS was not significantly different between the concurrent CRT arm and the RT-alone arm in the overall comparison, PFS was significantly prolonged in patients with advanced tumor and node stages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2002.08.149

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Chan, A. T. C., Teo, P. M. L., Ngan, R. K., Leung, T. W., Lau, W. H., Zee, B., Leung, S. F., Cheung, F. Y., Yeo, W., Yiu, H. H., Yu, K. H., Chiu, K. W., Chan, D. T., Mok, T., Yuen, K. T., Mo, F., Lai, M., Kwan, W. H., Choi, P., & Johnson, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2002-04-15
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
2038-2044
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2151645021
Cited by
474
References
6
FWCI
28.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent Chemotherapy-Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Progression-Free Survival Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.08.149
The paper
Chan, A. T. C., Teo, P. M. L., Ngan, R. K., Leung, T. W., Lau, W. H., Zee, B., Leung, S. F., Cheung, F. Y., Yeo, W., Yiu, H. H., Yu, K. H., Chiu, K. W., Chan, D. T., Mok, T., Yuen, K. T., Mo, F., Lai, M., Kwan, W. H., Choi, P., & Johnson, P. J. (2002). Concurrent Chemotherapy-Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Progression-Free Survival Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.08.149

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.