The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) coordinated an Intergroup study with the participation of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). This randomized phase III trial compared chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiotherapy was administered in both arms: 1.8- to 2.0-Gy/d fractions Monday to Friday for 35 to 39 fractions for a total dose of 70 Gy. The investigational arm received chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 during radiotherapy; postradiotherapy, chemotherapy with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 4 was administered every 4 weeks for three courses. Patients were stratified by tumor stage, nodal stage, performance status, and histology. RESULTS: Of 193 patients registered, 147 (69 radiotherapy and 78 chemoradiotherapy) were eligible for primary analysis for survival and toxicity. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 15 months for eligible patients on the radiotherapy arm and was not reached for the chemo-radiotherapy group. The 3-year PFS rate was 24% versus 69%, respectively (P < .001). The median survival time was 34 months for the radiotherapy group and not reached for the chemo-radiotherapy group, and the 3-year survival rate was 47% versus 78%, respectively (P = .005). One hundred eighty-five patients were included in a secondary analysis for survival. The 3-year survival rate for patients randomized to radiotherapy was 46%, and for the chemoradiotherapy group was 76% (P < .001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that chemoradiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancers with respect to PFS and overall survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wei, W. I., & Sham, J. S. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66698-6 · Cited by 1,208
Recent Advances in Head and Neck Cancer
Haddad, R. I., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0707975 · Cited by 916
Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era: The Hong Kong experience
Lee, A. W. M., Sze, W. M., Au, J. S. K., Leung, S. F., Leung, T. W., Chua, D. T. T., Zee, B. C. Y., Law, S. C. K., Teo, P. M. L., Tung, S. Y., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.702 · Cited by 587
Chan, A. T. C., Teo, P. M. L., Ngan, R. K., Leung, T. W., Lau, W. H., Zee, B., Leung, S. F., Cheung, F. Y., Yeo, W., Yiu, H. H., et al. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.08.149 · Cited by 474
Robert, F., Ezekiel, M. P., Spencer, S. A., Meredith, R. F., Bonner, J. A., Khazaeli, M. B., Saleh, M. N., Carey, D., LoBuglio, A. F., Wheeler, R. H., et al. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.13.3234 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Sarraf, M., LeBlanc, M., Giri, P. G., Fu, K. K., Cooper, J., Vuong, T., Forastiere, A. A., Adams, G., Sakr, W. A., Schuller, D. E., & Ensley, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1310-1317
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2125919881
- Cited by
- 2,222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1310
- The paper
- Al-Sarraf, M., LeBlanc, M., Giri, P. G., Fu, K. K., Cooper, J., Vuong, T., Forastiere, A. A., Adams, G., Sakr, W. A., Schuller, D. E., & Ensley, J. F. (1998). Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.