Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Second Malignant Neoplasms Among Long-Term Survivors of Hodgkin’s Disease: A Population-Based Evaluation Over 25 Years

Dores, Graça M., Metayer, Catherine, Curtis, Rochelle E., Lynch, Charles F., Clarke, E. Aileen, Glimelius, Bengt, Storm, Hans, Pukkala, Eero, van Leeuwen, Flora E., Holowaty, Eric J., Andersson, Michael, Wiklund, Tom, Joensuu, Timo, van’t Veer, Mars B., Stovall, Marilyn, Gospodarowicz, Mary, Travis, Lois B.·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the relative and absolute excess risks (AER) of site-specific second cancers, in particular solid tumors, among long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease (HD) and to assess risks according to age at HD diagnosis, attained age, and time since initial treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 32,591 HD patients (1,111 25-year survivors) reported to 16 population-based cancer registries in North America and Europe (1935 to 1994) were analyzed. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred fifty-three second cancers (observed-to-expected ratio [O/E] = 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2 to 2.4), including 1,726 solid tumors (O/E = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.9 to 2.0) were reported. Cancers of the lung (observed [Obs] = 377; O/E = 2.9), digestive tract (Obs = 376; O/E = 1.7), and female breast (Obs = 234; O/E = 2.0) accounted for the largest number of subsequent malignancies. Twenty-five years after HD diagnosis, the actuarial risk of developing a solid tumor was 21.9%. The relative risk of solid neoplasms decreased with increasing age at HD diagnosis, however, patients aged 51 to 60 years at HD diagnosis sustained the highest cancer burden (AER = 79.2/10,000 patients/year). After a progressive rise in relative risk and AER of all solid tumors over time, there was an apparent downturn in risk at 25 years. Temporal trends and treatment group distribution for cancers of the esophagus, stomach, rectum, female breast, bladder, thyroid, and bone/connective tissue were suggestive of a radiogenic effect. CONCLUSION: Significantly increased risks of second cancers were observed in all HD age groups. Although significantly elevated risks of stomach, female breast, and uterine cervix cancers persisted for 25 years, an apparent decrease in relative risk and AER of solid tumors at other sites is suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2002.09.038

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 565

Metadata

Authors
Dores, G. M., Metayer, C., Curtis, R. E., Lynch, C. F., Clarke, E. A., Glimelius, B., Storm, H., Pukkala, E., van Leeuwen, F. E., Holowaty, E. J., Andersson, M., Wiklund, T., Joensuu, T., van’t Veer, M. B., Stovall, M., Gospodarowicz, M., & Travis, L. B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2002-08-15
Volume
20
Issue
16
Pages
3484-3494
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2098179714
Cited by
565
References
2
FWCI
18.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second Malignant Neoplasms Among Long-Term Survivors of Hodgkin’s Disease: A Population-Based Evaluation Over 25 Years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.09.038
The paper
Dores, G. M., Metayer, C., Curtis, R. E., Lynch, C. F., Clarke, E. A., Glimelius, B., Storm, H., Pukkala, E., van Leeuwen, F. E., Holowaty, E. J., Andersson, M., Wiklund, T., Joensuu, T., van’t Veer, M. B., Stovall, M., Gospodarowicz, M., & Travis, L. B. (2002). Second Malignant Neoplasms Among Long-Term Survivors of Hodgkin’s Disease: A Population-Based Evaluation Over 25 Years. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.09.038

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.