Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 397

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic Factors in Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms: An Analysis of 136 Cases With a Proposal for Low-Grade and Intermediate-Grade Groups

Hochwald, Steven N., Zee, Sui, Conlon, Kevin C., Colleoni, Roberto, Louie, Otway, Brennan, Murray F., Klimstra, David S.·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: In some organs (eg, the lung), endocrine tumors are classified on the basis of mitotic rate and necrosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms recently treated at a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 136 patients undergoing surgery from 1979 to 1998, the influence on disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of tumor size, mitotic rate, vascular invasion, necrosis, metastases, and nuclear grade was determined. Cases were further grouped according to an existing proposed classification system and then regrouped on the basis of mitotic rate (< 2 mitoses per 50 high-power fields v higher) and necrosis (present or absent) into low- and intermediate-grade groups. RESULTS: Correlations with DFS and DSS in univariate analysis included ≤ 2 mitoses per 50 high-power fields (P = .001, P = .002), vascular invasion (P = .02, P = .04), size ≤ 2 cm (P = .01, P = .05), metastases (P = .0002, P = .07), necrosis (P = .002, P = .16), and nuclear grade (P = .04, P = .33), respectively. By multivariate analysis, for DFS, tumor necrosis and presence of metastases retained significance (P = .01, P = .04, respectively). For DSS, only mitotic rate was a prognostic factor (P = .02). Among the 18 macroadenomas, eight borderline tumors, and 48 low-grade carcinomas, there was no significant difference in DSS between any groups (P = .3). However, in evaluating our newly proposed groups, the differences in DFS and DSS between low- and intermediate-grade groups were highly significant (P = .0007, P = .006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms exhibit a spectrum of biologic behavior, and the proposed benign (macroadenoma) and borderline groups contain potentially aggressive tumors. An alternative system based on mitotic rate and necrosis correlates strongly with survival without specifically designating any group as benign.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2002.10.030

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 397

Metadata

Authors
Hochwald, S. N., Zee, S., Conlon, K. C., Colleoni, R., Louie, O., Brennan, M. F., & Klimstra, D. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
2633-2642
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2000987172
Cited by
397
References
0
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Factors in Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms: An Analysis of 136 Cases With a Proposal for Low-Grade and Intermediate-Grade Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.10.030
The paper
Hochwald, S. N., Zee, S., Conlon, K. C., Colleoni, R., Louie, O., Brennan, M. F., & Klimstra, D. S. (2002). Prognostic Factors in Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms: An Analysis of 136 Cases With a Proposal for Low-Grade and Intermediate-Grade Groups. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.10.030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.