Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Involved-Field Radiotherapy Is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Compared With Extended-Field Radiotherapy After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Unfavorable Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Results of the HD8 Trial of the German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group

Engert, Andreas, Schiller, Petra, Josting, Andreas, Herrmann, Richard, Koch, Peter, Sieber, Markus, Boissevain, Friederike, de Wit, Maike, Mezger, Jörg, Dühmke, Eckhart, Willich, Normann, Müller, Rolf-Peter, Schmidt, Bernhard F., Renner, Helmut, Müller-Hermelink, Hans Konrad, Pfistner, Beate, Wolf, Jürgen, Hasenclever, Dirk, Löffler, Markus, Diehl, Volker·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether radiotherapy can be reduced without loss of efficacy from extended field (EF) to involved field (IF) after four cycles of chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, patients with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavorable HD were enrolled onto this multicenter study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP) + doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) for two cycles followed by radiotherapy of 30 Gy EF + 10 Gy to bulky disease (arm A) or 30 Gy IF + 10 Gy to bulky disease (arm B). Results: Of 1,204 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 1,064 patients were informative and eligible for the arm comparison (532 patients in arm A; 532 patients in arm B). The median observation time was 54 months. Five years after random assignment, the overall survival (OS ran) for all eligible patients was 91% and freedom from treatment failure (FFTF ran) was 83%. Survival rates at 5 years after start of radiotherapy revealed no differences for arms A and B, respectively, in terms of FFTF (85.8% and 84.2%) and OS at 5 years (90.8% and 92.4%). There also were no differences between arms A and B, respectively, in terms of complete remission (98.5% and 97.2%), progressive disease (0.8% and 1.9%), relapse (6.4% and 7.7%), death (8.1% and 6.4%), and secondary neoplasia (4.5% and 2.8%). In contrast, acute side effects including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, gastrointestinal toxicity, and pharyngeal toxicity were more frequent in the EF arm. Conclusion: Radiotherapy volume size reduction from EF to IF after COPP + ABVD chemotherapy for two cycles produces similar results and less toxicity in patients with early-stage unfavorable HD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.03.023

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Engert, A., Schiller, P., Josting, A., Herrmann, R., Koch, P., Sieber, M., Boissevain, F., de Wit, M., Mezger, J., Dühmke, E., Willich, N., Müller, R.-P., Schmidt, B. F., Renner, H., Müller-Hermelink, H. K., Pfistner, B., Wolf, J., Hasenclever, D., Löffler, M., & Diehl, V.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
21
Issue
19
Pages
3601-3608
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2121605135
Cited by
460
References
1
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Involved-Field Radiotherapy Is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Compared With Extended-Field Radiotherapy After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Unfavorable Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Results of the HD8 Trial of the German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.03.023
The paper
Engert, A., Schiller, P., Josting, A., Herrmann, R., Koch, P., Sieber, M., Boissevain, F., de Wit, M., Mezger, J., Dühmke, E., Willich, N., Müller, R.-P., Schmidt, B. F., Renner, H., Müller-Hermelink, H. K., Pfistner, B., Wolf, J., Hasenclever, D., Löffler, M., & Diehl, V. (2003). Involved-Field Radiotherapy Is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Compared With Extended-Field Radiotherapy After Four Cycles of Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Unfavorable Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Results of the HD8 Trial of the German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.03.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.