Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Solid Cancer Risk Among 5-Year Survivors of Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Hodgson, David C., Gilbert, Ethel S., Dores, Graça M., Schonfeld, Sara J., Lynch, Charles F., Storm, Hans, Hall, Per, Langmark, Froydis, Pukkala, Eero, Andersson, Michael, Kaijser, Magnus, Joensuu, Heikki, Fosså, Sophie D., Travis, Lois B.·2007·Journal of Clinical Oncology
DOI 10.1200/jco.2006.09.0936
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) survivors are known to be at substantially increased risk of solid cancers (SC). However, no investigation has used multivariate modeling to estimate the relative risk (RR), excess absolute risk (EAR), and cumulative incidence for specific attained ages and ages at HL diagnosis. Patients and Methods: We identified 18,862 5-year HL survivors from 13 population-based cancer registries in North America and Europe. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the effects of age at diagnosis, attained age, latency, sex, treatment, and year of diagnosis on the RR and EAR of SC. Results: Among 1,490 identified SC, 850 were estimated to be in excess. For most cancer sites, both RR and EAR decreased with age at HL diagnosis and showed strong dependencies on attained age. For a patient diagnosed at age 30 years and survived to ≥ 40 years, modeled risks were significantly elevated for cancers of the breast (RR = 6.1), other supradiaphragmatic sites (RR = 6.0), and infradiaphragmatic sites (RR = 3.7); the largest RR (20-fold) was observed for malignant mesothelioma. Thirty-year cumulative risks of SC for men and women diagnosed at 30 years were 18% and 26%, respectively, compared with 7% and 9%, respectively, in the general population. For young HL patients, risks of breast and colorectal cancers were elevated 10 to 25 years before the age when routine screening would be recommended in the general population. Conclusion: Multivariable modeling demonstrates for the first time temporal changes in SC risk not evident in unadjusted analyses, and can facilitate the development of individualized risk assessment and the creation of screening strategies for early detection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2006.09.0936

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Hodgson, D. C., Gilbert, E. S., Dores, G. M., Schonfeld, S. J., Lynch, C. F., Storm, H., Hall, P., Langmark, F., Pukkala, E., Andersson, M., Kaijser, M., Joensuu, H., Fosså, S. D., & Travis, L. B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Published
2007-04-20
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
1489-1497
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
DOI
10.1200/jco.2006.09.0936
OpenAlex
W2103004443
Cited by
351
References
22
FWCI
12.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Solid Cancer Risk Among 5-Year Survivors of Hodgkin's Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2006.09.0936
The paper
Hodgson, D. C., Gilbert, E. S., Dores, G. M., Schonfeld, S. J., Lynch, C. F., Storm, H., Hall, P., Langmark, F., Pukkala, E., Andersson, M., Kaijser, M., Joensuu, H., Fosså, S. D., & Travis, L. B. (2007). Long-Term Solid Cancer Risk Among 5-Year Survivors of Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.09.0936

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.