The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer by Hormone Receptor Status From 1992 to 1998
Abstract
Purpose: Between 1987 and 1998, breast cancer incidence rates rose 0.5%/yr in the United States. A question of potential etiologic and clinical importance is whether the hormone receptor status of breast tumors is also changing over time. This is because hormone receptor status may reflect different etiologic pathways and is useful in predicting response to adjuvant therapy and prognosis. Methods: Age-adjusted, age-specific breast cancer incidence rates by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status from 1992 to 1998 were obtained and compared from 11 population-based cancer registries in the United States that participate in the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Results: From 1992 to1998, the overall proportion of breast cancers that were ER-positive and PR-positive increased from 75.4% to 77.5% (P = .0002) and from 65.0% to 67.7% (P < .0001), respectively, continuing trends observed before 1992. These increases were limited to women 40 to 69 years of age. The proportions of ER-positive/PR-positive tumors increased from 56.7% to 62.3% (P = .0010) among 40- to 49-year-olds, from 58.0% to 63.2% (P = .0002) among 50- to 59-year-olds, and from 63.2% to 67.9% (P = .0020) among 60- to 69-year-olds. Conclusion: From 1992 to 1998, the proportion of tumors that are hormone receptor–positive rose as the proportion of hormone receptor–negative tumors declined. Because the incidence rates of hormone receptor–negative tumors remained fairly constant over these years, the overall rise in breast cancer incidence rates in the United States seems to be primarily a result of the increase in the incidence of hormone receptor–positive tumors. Hormonal factors may account for this trend.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention
Britt, K. L., Cuzick, J., & Phillips, K.-A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x · Cited by 992
Dunnwald, L. K., Rossing, M. A., & Li, C. I. (2007) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr1639 · Cited by 785
Self-citationKesson, E. M., Allardice, G. M., George, W. D., Burns, H. J. G., & Morrison, D. S. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e2718 · Cited by 579
Soy, isoflavones, and breast cancer risk in Japan
Yamamoto, S., Sobue, T., Kobayashi, M., Sasaki, S., & Tsugane, S. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.12.906 · Cited by 391
Goetz, M. P., Sangkuhl, K., Guchelaar, H., Schwab, M., Province, M., Whirl‐Carrillo, M., Symmans, W. F., McLeod, H. L., Ratain, M. J., Zembutsu, H., et al. (2018) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.1007 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C. I., Daling, J. R., & Malone, K. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-34
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2163134191
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer by Hormone Receptor Status From 1992 to 1998. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.03.088
- The paper
- Li, C. I., Daling, J. R., & Malone, K. E. (2003). Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer by Hormone Receptor Status From 1992 to 1998. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.03.088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.