The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients
Open accessAbstract
Background: Breast cancer patients with tumors that are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive have lower risks of mortality after their diagnosis compared to women with ER- and/or PR-negative disease. However, few studies have evaluated variations in the risks of breast cancer-specific mortality across ER/PR status by either demographic or clinical characteristics. Methods: Using data from 11 population-based cancer registries that participate in the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program, 155,175 women at least 30 years old with a primary diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma from 1990 to 2001 were included in the study. Associations between joint hormone receptor status and breast cancer mortality risk within categories of diagnosis age, diagnosis year, race/ethnicity, histologic tumor type, stage, grade, size, and axillary lymph node status were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Compared to ER+/PR+ cases, elevations in risk of mortality were observed across all subcategories of age at diagnosis, ranging from 1.2- to 1.5-fold differences for ER+/PR- cases, 1.5- to 2.1-fold differences for ER-/PR+ cases, and 2.1- to 2.6-fold differences for ER-/PR- cases. Greater differences were observed in analyses stratified by grade; among women with low-grade lesions, ER-/PR- patients had a 2.6-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 3.9) to 3.1-fold (95% CI 2.8 to 3.4) increased risk of mortality compared to ER+/PR+ patients, but among women with high-grade lesions, they had a 2.1-fold (95% CI 1.9 to 2.2) to 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.8 to 2.8) increased risk. Conclusion: Compared to women with ER+/PR+ tumors, women with ER+/PR-, ER-/PR+, or ER-/PR- tumors experienced higher risks of mortality, which were largely independent of the various demographic and clinical tumor characteristics assessed in this study. The higher relative mortality risks identified among ER-/PR- patients with small or low-grade tumors raise the question of whether there may be a beneficial role for adjuvant chemotherapy in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
Aitkin, M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530581 · Cited by 9,877
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data
Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118032985 · Cited by 3,219
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data
Klein, J. P. (1982) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1982.10487769 · Cited by 2,215
Harvey, J. M., Clark, G. M., Osborne, C. K., & Allred, D. C. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.5.1474 · Cited by 2,056
Bardou, V.-J., Arpino, G., Elledge, R. M., Osborne, C. K., & Clark, G. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.09.099 · Cited by 752
IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention: Breast cancer screening
Feig, S. A. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11334 · Cited by 742
Berry, D. A., Cirrincione, C., Henderson, I. C., Citron, M. L., Budman, D. R., Goldstein, L. J., Martino, S., Perez, E. A., Muss, H. B., Norton, L., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.14.1658 · Cited by 731
Goldhirsch, A., Wood, W. C., Gelber, R. D., Coates, A. S., Thürlimann, B., & Senn, H.-J. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.04.576 · Cited by 697
Cited by
Györffy, B., Lanczky, A., Eklund, A. C., Denkert, C., Budczies, J., Li, Q., & Szallasi, Z. (2010) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0674-9 · Cited by 4,169
Patnaik, J. L., Byers, T., DiGuiseppi, C., Dabelea, D., & Denberg, T. D. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr2901 · Cited by 872
Prat, A., Cheang, M. C. U., Martín, M., Parker, J. S., Carrasco, E., Caballero, R., Tyldesley, S., Gelmon, K., Bernard, P. S., Nielsen, T. O., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.43.4134 · Cited by 587
Health and Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer
Yedjou, C. G., Sims, J. N., Miele, L., Noubissi, F., Lowe, L., Fonseca, D. D., Alo, R. A., Payton, M., & Tchounwou, P. B. (2019) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_3 · Cited by 509
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunnwald, L. K., Rossing, M. A., & Li, C. I.
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research
- Published
- 2007-01-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R6-R6
- ISSN
- 1465-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-542X
- OpenAlex
- W1881540319
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/bcr1639
- The paper
- Dunnwald, L. K., Rossing, M. A., & Li, C. I. (2007). Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.