Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kinase Mutations and Imatinib Response in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Heinrich, Michael C., Corless, Christopher L., Demetri, George D., Blanke, Charles D., von Mehren, Margaret, Joensuu, Heikki, McGreevey, Laura S., Chen, Chang-Jie, Van den Abbeele, Annick D., Druker, Brian J., Kiese, Beate, Eisenberg, Burton, Roberts, Peter J., Singer, Samuel, Fletcher, Christopher D.M., Silberman, Sandra, Dimitrijevic, Sasa, Fletcher, Jonathan A.·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) express constitutively activated mutant isoforms of KIT or kinase platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) that are potential therapeutic targets for imatinib mesylate. The relationship between mutations in these kinases and clinical response to imatinib was examined in a group of patients with advanced GIST. Patients and Methods: GISTs from 127 patients enrolled onto a phase II clinical study of imatinib were examined for mutations of KIT or PDGFRA. Mutation types were correlated with clinical outcome. Results: Activating mutations of KIT or PDGFRA were found in 112 (88.2%) and six (4.7%) GISTs, respectively. Most KIT mutations involved exon 9 (n = 23) or exon 11 (n = 85). All KIT mutant isoforms, but only a subset of PDGFRA mutant isoforms, were sensitive to imatinib, in vitro. In patients with GISTs harboring exon 11 KIT mutations, the partial response rate (PR) was 83.5%, whereas patients with tumors containing an exon 9 KIT mutation or no detectable mutation of KIT or PDGFRA had PR rates of 47.8% (P = .0006) and 0.0% (P < .0001), respectively. Patients whose tumors contained exon 11 KIT mutations had a longer event-free and overall survival than those whose tumors expressed either exon 9 KIT mutations or had no detectable kinase mutation. Conclusion: Activating mutations of KIT or PDGFRA are found in the vast majority of GISTs, and the mutational status of these oncoproteins is predictive of clinical response to imatinib. PDGFRA mutations can explain response and sensitivity to imatinib in some GISTs lacking KIT mutations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.04.190

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 2,299

Metadata

Authors
Heinrich, M. C., Corless, C. L., Demetri, G. D., Blanke, C. D., von Mehren, M., Joensuu, H., McGreevey, L. S., Chen, C.-J., Van den Abbeele, A. D., Druker, B. J., Kiese, B., Eisenberg, B., Roberts, P. J., Singer, S., Fletcher, C. D. M., Silberman, S., Dimitrijevic, S., & Fletcher, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
21
Issue
23
Pages
4342-4349
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2150501295
Cited by
2,299
References
4
FWCI
100.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinase Mutations and Imatinib Response in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.04.190
The paper
Heinrich, M. C., Corless, C. L., Demetri, G. D., Blanke, C. D., von Mehren, M., Joensuu, H., McGreevey, L. S., Chen, C.-J., Van den Abbeele, A. D., Druker, B. J., Kiese, B., Eisenberg, B., Roberts, P. J., Singer, S., Fletcher, C. D. M., Silberman, S., Dimitrijevic, S., & Fletcher, J. A. (2003). Kinase Mutations and Imatinib Response in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.04.190

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.