The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer
Abstract
This account of the highlights of the eighth St Gallen (Switzerland) meeting in 2003 emphasizes new information that has emerged during the 2 years since the seventh meeting in 2001. This article should be read in conjunction with the report of that earlier meeting. Recommendations for patient care are so critically dependent on assessment of endocrine responsiveness that the importance of high-quality steroid hormone receptor determination and standardized quantitative reporting cannot be overemphasized. The International Consensus Panel modified the risk categories so that only endocrine receptor–absent status was sufficient to reclassify an otherwise low-risk, node-negative disease into the category of average risk. Absence of steroid hormone receptors also was recognized as indicating endocrine nonresponsiveness. Some important areas highlighted at the recent meeting include: (1) recognition of the separate nature of endocrine-nonresponsive breast cancer—both invasive cancers and ductal carcinoma-in-situ; (2) improved understanding of the mechanisms of acquired endocrine resistance, which offer exciting prospects for extending the impact of successful sequential endocrine therapies; (3) presentation of high-quality evidence indicating that chemotherapy and tamoxifen should be used sequentially rather than concurrently; (4) availability of a potential alternative to tamoxifen for treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive disease; and (5) the promise of newly defined prognostic and predictive markers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Mariani, L., Greco, M., Saccozzi, R., Luini, A., Aguilar, M., & Marubini, E. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020989 · Cited by 4,450
Cited by
Trastuzumab after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Piccart-Gebhart, M. J., Procter, M., Leyland-Jones, B., Goldhirsch, A., Untch, M., Smith, I., Gianni, L., Baselga, J., Bell, R., Jackisch, C., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052306 · Cited by 5,084
Self-citationCoombes, R. C., Hall, E., Gibson, L. J., Paridaens, R., Jassem, J., Delozier, T., Jones, S. E., Alvarez, I., Bertelli, G., Ortmann, O., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040331 · Cited by 1,759
Self-citationChang, H. Y., Nuyten, D. S. A., Sneddon, J. B., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Sørlie, T., Dai, H., He, Y. D., van't Veer, L. J., Bartelink, H., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409462102 · Cited by 981
Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Persistent Pain Following Breast Cancer Surgery
Gärtner, R., Jensen, M.-B., Nielsen, J., Ewertz, M., Kroman, N., & Kehlet, H. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1568 · Cited by 908
Overgaard, M., Nielsen, H. M., & Overgaard, J. (2007) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.001 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldhirsch, A., Wood, W. C., Gelber, R. D., Coates, A. S., Thürlimann, B., & Senn, H.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3357-3365
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1970797634
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.04.576
- The paper
- Goldhirsch, A., Wood, W. C., Gelber, R. D., Coates, A. S., Thürlimann, B., & Senn, H.-J. (2003). Meeting Highlights: Updated International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.04.576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.