Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation by Older Women With Breast Cancer

Kemeny, M. Margaret, Peterson, Bercedis L., Kornblith, Alice B., Muss, Hyman B., Wheeler, Judith, Levine, Ellis, Bartlett, Nancy, Fleming, Gini, Cohen, Harvey J.·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Although 48% of breast cancer patients are 65 years old or older, these older patients are severely underrepresented in breast cancer clinical trials. This study tested whether older patients were offered trials significantly less often than younger patients and whether older patients who were offered trials were more likely to refuse participation than younger patients. Patients and Methods: In 10 Cancer and Leukemia Group B institutions, using a retrospective case-control design, breast cancer patients eligible for an open treatment trial were paired: less than 65 years old and ≥ 65 years old. Each of the 77 pairs were matched by disease stage and treating physician. Patients were interviewed as to their reasons for participating or refusing to participate in a trial. The treating physicians were also given questionnaires about their reasons for offering or not offering a trial. Results: Sixty-eight percent of younger stage II patients were offered a trial compared with 34% of the older patients (P = .0004). In multivariate analyses, disease stage and age remained highly significant in predicting trial offering (P = .0008), when controlling for physical functioning and comorbidity. Of those offered a trial, there was no significant difference in participation between younger (56%) and older (50%) patients (P = .67). Conclusion: In a multivariate analysis including comorbid conditions, age and stage were the only predictors of whether a patient was offered a trial. The greatest impediment to enrolling older women onto trials in the setting of this study was the physicians’ perceptions about age and tolerance of toxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.09.124

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Kemeny, M. M., Peterson, B. L., Kornblith, A. B., Muss, H. B., Wheeler, J., Levine, E., Bartlett, N., Fleming, G., & Cohen, H. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-06-15
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
2268-2275
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1964543752
Cited by
465
References
22
FWCI
22.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation by Older Women With Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.09.124
The paper
Kemeny, M. M., Peterson, B. L., Kornblith, A. B., Muss, H. B., Wheeler, J., Levine, E., Bartlett, N., Fleming, G., & Cohen, H. J. (2003). Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation by Older Women With Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.09.124

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.