The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinomas: Correlation Between Gene Copy Number and Protein Expression and Impact on Prognosis
Abstract
Purpose: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently overexpressed in non–small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and EGFR inhibitors are promising new therapeutic agents. The molecular mechanisms responsible for EGFR overexpression are poorly understood. Materials and Methods: Gene copy number and protein status of EGFR were investigated in microarrayed tumors from 183 NSCLC patients, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 89 patients) and non-SCC (94 patients) histologies. Protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on a scale from 0 to 400 (percentage of positive cells × staining intensity). Gene and chromosome 7 copy numbers were identified by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Results: EGFR protein overexpression was observed in 62% of the NSCLC (25% scored 201 to 300; 37% scored 301 to 400), more frequently in SCC than non-SCC (82% v 44%; P < .001), and in 80% of the bronchioloalveolar carcinomas. The prevalent FISH patterns were balanced disomy (40%) and trisomy (38%) for EGFR gene and chromosome 7 (40%), whereas balanced polysomy was seen in 13% and gene amplification was seen in 9% of the patients. Gene copy number correlated with protein expression (r = 0.4; P < .001). EGFR overexpression or high gene copy numbers had no significant influence on prognosis. Conclusion: EGFR overexpression is frequent in NSCLC, is most prominent in SCC, and correlates with increased gene copy number per cell. High gene copy numbers per cell showed a trend toward poor prognosis. It will be important to evaluate EGFR gene and EGFR protein status and signal protein expression to properly interpret future clinical trials using EGFR inhibitors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pao, W., Miller, V., Zakowski, M., Doherty, J., Politi, K., Sarkaria, I., Singh, B., Heelan, R., Rusch, V., Fulton, L., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0405220101 · Cited by 4,338
Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer
Sharma, S. V., Bell, D. W., Settleman, J., & Haber, D. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2088 · Cited by 3,170
Kris, M. G., Natale, R. B., Herbst, R. S., Lynch, Jr., Prager, D., Belani, C. P., Schiller, J. H., Kelly, K., Spiridonidis, H., Sandler, A., et al. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.16.2149 · Cited by 2,517
Hirsch, F. R., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P. A., Franklin, W. A., Dziadziuszko, R., Thatcher, N., Chang, A., Parikh, P., Pereira, J. R., Ciuleanu, T., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.3958 · Cited by 703
Self-citationKelly, K., Chansky, K., Gaspar, L. E., Albain, K. S., Jett, J., Ung, Y. C., Lau, D. H. M., Crowley, J. J., & Gandara, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.4824 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirsch, F. R., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P. A., Di Maria, M. V., Veve, R., Bremnes, R. M., Barón, A. E., Zeng, C., & Franklin, W. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-10-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3798-3807
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2138604360
- Cited by
- 1,477
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinomas: Correlation Between Gene Copy Number and Protein Expression and Impact on Prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.11.069
- The paper
- Hirsch, F. R., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P. A., Di Maria, M. V., Veve, R., Bremnes, R. M., Barón, A. E., Zeng, C., & Franklin, W. A. (2003). Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinomas: Correlation Between Gene Copy Number and Protein Expression and Impact on Prognosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.11.069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.